Medicolegal Psychopharmacology

  • Thomas G. Gutheil

Abstract

Clinicians in all fields of medicine, including psychiatry, have become acutely conscious of the problems posed by the threat of liability. In psychopharmacology, courts and attorneys are able to understand and see some of the concrete actions of the pharmacological agents, in contrast to the relatively cloudy effects of psychotherapy, thus increasing the likelihood of litigation. In this context, clinicians must understand the medicolegal issues that surround, limit, and influence their practice of psychopharmacology.

Keywords

Tardive Dyskinesia Therapeutic Alliance Informed Consent Process Refuse Treatment Competent Patient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gutheil T. G., Appelbaum P. S.: Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gutheil T. G., Bursztajn H., Brodsky A.: Malpractice prevention through the sharing of uncertainty: Informed consent and the therapeutic alliance. N Engl J Med 311:49–51, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gutheil T. G.: The psychology of psychopharmacology. Bull Menninger Clin 46:321–330, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutheil T. G.: The right to refuse treatment: Paradox, pendulum and quality of care. Behav Sci Law 4:265–277, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5..
    For example, see Stensvad v Reivitz (D.C. Wisc. 84-C-383–5, Jan. 10, 1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6..
    Youngberg v Romeo 50 U. S. L. W. 4681 (June 15, 1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7..
    For example, see Rivers v Katz 495 N.E.2d 337 (N.Y., 1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoge S. K., Gutheil T. G., Kaplan E.: The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: Preliminary empirical findings and comparisons. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 15:163–169, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Appelbaum P. S., Gutheil T. G.: The right to refuse treatment: The real issue is quality of care. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 9:199–202, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Appelbaum P. S., Gutheil T. G.: Clinical aspects of treatment refusal. Compr Psychiatry 23:560–566, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas G. Gutheil
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Program in Psychiatry and the LawMassachusetts Mental Health CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations