Skip to main content

Formal Development of General Relativity

  • Chapter
Essential Relativity
  • 334 Accesses

Abstract

We shall not significantly manipulate tensors in our account of GR, but even just in order to exhibit the field equations, we need the notation of general tensors. Moreover, no idea of the flavor of actual work in GR can be conveyed without at least some examples of tensors in action. If he wishes, however, the reader may skim lightly over the present section and only refer back to it as need arises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 6.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • See, for example, A. S. Eddington, “The Mathematical Theory of Relativity,” p. 85, Cambridge University Press,.1924. For a more modern computational technique see Appendix A of C. W. Misner, J. Math. Phys., 4, 924 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • For a rigorous proof, see W. B. Bonnor’s article in “Recent Developments in General Relativity,” p. 167, New York, Pergamon Press, Inc., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phys. Rev. 119, 1743 (1960). Kruskal mistakenly seems to credit E. Kasner with the original discovery in 1921; Kasner’s work is discussed and modified by C. Fronsdal in Phys. Rev. 116, 778 (1959). Actually, it was A. S. Eddington (Nature 113, 192 (1924)) who first transformed Schwarzschild’s metric into a form not singular at r = 2m, but he seems not to have noticed this. (His paper, incidentally, contains a misleading misprint: eq. (2) should have r - 2m instead of r - m.) Eddington’s transformation was rediscovered by D. Finkelstein Phys. Rev. 110, 965 (1958). G. Lemaître’s paper is in Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A53, 51 (1933).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • For further details of the analogy between Kruskal space and the hyperbolic field, see W. Rindler, Am. J. Phys. 34, 1174 (1966). † Theoretically, intelligent beings could stop each star in a galaxy in its motion by ejecting a (small) part of its substance. (See exercise 5–16.) The residual stars would then fall towards the galactic mass center under their mutual gravitation, and eventually disappear through the galactic Schwarzschild radius.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Anderson, “Principles of Relativity Physics,” New York, Academic Press, 1967; see also his Chapter 9 in “Gravitation and Relativity,” Chiu and Hoffmann, editors, New York, W. A. Benjamin, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, for example, J. Weber, “Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Today 21, 34 (April 1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cf. Eddington, loc. cit., Section 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • See A. S. Eddington, “Space, Time, and Gravitation,” Chapter X, Cambridge University Press, 1920 (and New York, Harper Torchbooks, 1959). Also Eddington, loc. cit. (Mathematical Theory) p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rindler, W. (1969). Formal Development of General Relativity. In: Essential Relativity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1135-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1135-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90201-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1135-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics