A Review of the Land Battle Models Used at DOAE and Some Applications

  • D. Faddy


The Defence Operational Analysis Establishment was established to assist decision making in the Ministry of Defence by providing analytical advice. The types of decision involved are best illustrated by examples. In the first place there are decisions related to the allocation of scarce resources for the procurement of particular types of equipment rather than alternative options. Examples of studies for equipment decisions are those of the mix of anti-armour weapons in the battle group and USGW versus torpedoes for the attack of ships. Other decisions for which DOAE carries out studies involve rather wider questions of Defence policy affecting a whole range of equipments and units and which may not directly involve cost. An example is the analysis of possible MBFR options. As DOAE’s analytical capability develops it is becoming involved with questions of wider and wider scope, and in particular with problems of force structure.


Defence Policy Corps Level Defensive Position Corps Model Warsaw Pact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T.G. Weale: The Mathematics of Battle I; A Bivariate Probability Distribution. DOAE Memorandum No 7129 Dec 1971Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T.G. Weale: The Mathematics of Battle II: The Moments of the Distribution of Battle States. DOAE Memo- randum No 713o, October 1972Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Jennings: The Mathematics of Battle III: The Approximate Moments of the Distribution of the States of a Simple Heterogeneous Battle. DOAE Memorandum No 7315Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Jennings: The Mathematics of Battle IV: Stochastic “Linear Law” Battle. DOAE Memorandum No 7316Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.L. Grainger and G. Thornton: The Incorporation of Terrain Data into a Lanchester Model. NATO/SPPOSS Conference on Modelling Land Battle Systems for Military Planning, Munich, August 1974Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.W. Daniel, G.C. Beare and P. Grainger: Model of Combat at Battle Group Level. DOAE Memorandum No 7407Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Witts: The Corps Model. DOAE Memorandum No 7408Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.P. Dare: The NATO Deployment Model (1971 Version. DOAE Memorandum No 7210Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O.P. Dare and Maj M.E. Dyde: Some Implications of Force Reductions on the Military Balance in the NATO Central Region. DOAE Memorandum No 7310Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Faddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Defence Operational Analysis EstablishmentWest ByfleetUK

Personalised recommendations