Biochemical Evidence For Chromophore-Chromophore Interactions as the Main Organizational Principle in Chlorosomes of Chloroflexus Aurantiacus

  • Kai Griebenow
  • Alfred R. Holzwarth
Part of the FEMS Symposium book series (FEMSS)

Abstract

Chlorosomes are the main light-harvesting antennae of Chlorobiaceae and Chloroflexaceae. Chlorosomes from C. aurantiacus have been prepared in the past only by methods based on density gradient centrifugation (SDGC) (1–3) without detergents (2) or with miranol (1) as detergent. These chlorosomes always contain BChl a which was thought to be a part of the so-called baseplate (1) which attaches the chlorosomes to the cytoplasmic membrane (CM). Studies by PAGE of these chlorosomes showed the occurance of at least four proteins in the chlorosome band isolated from the gradient. Different values have been reported for the Mr of these proteins. Schmidt et al. (4) resolved only two proteins with Mr of 10 and 15 kD while Sprague et al. (3) reported three proteins Mr of 13.7, 12.4 and < 12.4 kD (approx. 10 kD from the Fig. given). Feick et al. (5) resolved four proteins with Mr of 18, 11, 5.8 and 3.7 kD. The very different values reported particularly for the Mr of the smallest protein may be explained by the different gel-systems and marker proteins used but could also indicate differences between these preparations.

Keywords

Trypsin Inhibitor Cytoplasmic Membrane Silver Staining Relative Molecular Weight Green Photosynthetic Bacterium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Feick,R.G., Fitzpatrick,M. and Fuller,R.C. J. Bacteriol. 150, 905–915 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt.K. Arch. Microbiol. 124, 21–31 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sprague,S.G., Staehelin,A., DiBartolomeis,M.J. and Fuller,R.C. J. Bacteriobiol. 147, 1021–1031 (1981).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt,K., Maarzahl,M. and Mayer,F. Arch. Microbiol. 127, 87–97 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feick,R.G. and Fuller,R.C. Biochemistry 23, 3693–3700 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wechsler,T., Suter,F., Fuller,R.C. and Zuber,H. FEBS Lett. 181, 173–178 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blankenship,R.E., Brune,D.C., Freeman,J.M., Trost,J.T., King,G.H., McManus,J.H., Nozawa,T. and Wittmershaus,B.P. in Green Photosynthetic Bacteria (eds: Olson, J.M., Ormerod, J.G., Amesz, J., Stackebrandt, E. and Trüper, H.G.) 57–68 ( Plenum Press, New York 1988 ).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lutz,M. and van Brakel,G. in Green Photosynthetic Bacteria (eds: Olson, J.M., Ormerod, J.G., Amesz, J., Stackebrandt, E. and Trtiper, H.G.) 23–34 ( Plenum Press, New York 1988 ).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bystrova,M.I., Malgosheva,I.N. and Kranovskii,A.A. Mol. Biol. 13, 440–451 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith,K.M. and Kehrs,K.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 1387–1389 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griebenow,K. and Holzwarth,A.R. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 973, 235–240 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heukeshoven,J. and Dernick,R. Electrophoresis 9, 28–32 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laemmli,U.K. Nature 227, 680–685 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heukeshoven,J. and Dernick,R. Electrophoresis 6, 103–112 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heukeshoven,J. and Dernick,R. Elektrophorese Forum 86 Diskussionstagung Okt. 1986: 22–27.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weber,K. and Osborn,M. J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4406–4412 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Griebenow
    • 1
  • Alfred R. Holzwarth
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für StrahlenchemieMülheim/RuhrGermany

Personalised recommendations