Approaches to Mental Workload

  • William B. Rouse
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 8)

Abstract

There appear to be two main reasons for being interested in human workload. The first reason concerns the impact of workload on human performance. This concern reflects the system design point of view where human performance is an important factor in system performance. The second motivation for being interested in human workload concerns task design and job satisfaction. This consideration emphasizes the fact that humans have interests beyond optimization of traditional indices of system performance.

Keywords

Linear Dynamic System Mental Workload Workload Measure Information Theory Approach Composite Definition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afifi, A.A. and Azen, S.P. 1972. Statistical Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. Carbonell, J.R. 1966. “A Queueing Model of Many-Instrument Visual Sampling”. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, Vol. HFE-7, No.. 4, pp. 157–164 December 1966.Google Scholar
  3. Enstrom, K.D. and Rouse, W.B. 1977. “Real Time Determination of How a Human Has Allocated His Attention Between Control and Monitoring Tasks”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Vol. SMC-7, No. 3, pp. 153–161, March 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Gartner, W.B. and Murphy, M.R. 1976. Pilot Workload and Fatigue: A Critical Survey of Concepts and Assessment Techniques; Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center, NASA Technical Note TN_ D-8365 November 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Hess, R.A. 1977. “Prediction of Pilot Opinion Ratings Using An Optimal Pilot Model”. Human Factors in press.Google Scholar
  6. Jahns, D.W. 1973. The Concept of Operator Workload in Manual Vehicle Operations. Meckenheim, F.R~ Germanys - Research Institute for Human Engineering, Report No 14_ December 19 73 Google Scholar
  7. Kleinman, D.L. and Curry, R.E. 1976. “Some New Control Theoretic Models for Human Operator Display Monitoring”. Proceedings of the IEEE Decision and Control Conference Clearwater Beach, Florida, December 1976 Google Scholar
  8. Levison, W.H. 1970. “A Model for Task Interference”. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Manual Control, WrightPattersonAFB April 1970, pp. 585–616.Google Scholar
  9. Rouse, W.B. 1977. “Human-Computer Interaction in Multi-Task Situations”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Vol. SMC-7, No. 5, May 1977.Google Scholar
  10. Senders, J.W. 1964. “The Human Operator as a Monitor and Controller of Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems”. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics Vol. HFE-5, No. 1, pp.2–5, September, 1964.Google Scholar
  11. Tatsuoka, M.M. 1971. Multivariate Analysis New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • William B. Rouse
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations