Biomass—The Agricultural Perspective

  • William J. Sheppard
  • Brian Young
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 67)

Abstract

In considering the interest that the agricultural industry might have in biomass production for energy, it is important to consider the motivation for this activity. It is also appropriate to ask why an energy user would want to use biomass and why a government would want to encourage the production and consumption of biomass energy. Without trying to exhaust all the possible reasons, three come to mind quickly:
  • to make or save money

  • to solve a problem

  • to decrease risk.

Keywords

Crop Residue Sugarcane Bagasse Wood Product Sweet Sorghum Oilseed Crop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Agricultural Outlook. 1982. August. p. 33-34.Google Scholar
  2. Compos-Lopez, E. and Palacios, J. 1976. J. Polymer Sci. Polymer Sci. Polymer Chem. 14:1561. See also: Compos-Lopez, E. et al. 1978. Guayule: State of knowledge. In: Guayule: Rencuentro en al Desierto, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico City. pp. 375 - 410.Google Scholar
  3. Canada Grains Council. 1981. Canadian Grain Statistics Handbook.Winnipeg,Manitoba.Google Scholar
  4. Ernest, R.K., Hamilton, R.H., Borgeson, N.S., Schooley, F.A. and Dickenson, R.L. 1979. Mission Analyses for the Federal Fuels from Biomass Program. Vol. III: Feedstock Availability. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Howlett, K. and Gamache, A. 1977. Silvicultural Biomass Farms Vol. VI:Forest and Mill Residues as Potential Sources of Biomass. Prepared by Mitre Corp. for Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. National Academy of Science. 1977. Guayule: An Alternative Source of Natural Rubber. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Purdue University. 1979. The Potential of Producing Energy from Agriculture. Prepared for OTA by Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
  8. Scott, Tony. 1982. Personal communication. Whey Products Institute, Chicago, Illinois. Sept. 1982.Google Scholar
  9. Spiewak S., Nichols, J.P., Alvic, D., Delene, J.G. Fitzgerald, B.H., Hightower, J.R., Klepper, O.H., Krummel, J.R. and Mills, J.B. 1982. Technical Analysis of the Use of Biomass for Energy Production. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  10. Statistics Canada. 1981. Canadian Forestry Statistics 1979. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Catalogue 25 - 202.Google Scholar
  11. USDA. 1961. Agricultural Statistics 1961. U.S.Department of Ag-riculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. USDA. 1973. The Outlook for Timber in the United States. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Resource Report No. 20, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. USDA. 1980. Dairy Products Annual Summary, 1980. U.S. Department of Agriculture Crop Reporting Board; Economics and Statistics Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. USDA. 1981. Agricultural Statistics 1981. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. USDA. 1981a. Agricultural Prices Annual Summary 1981. U.S. Department of Agriculture Crop Reporting Board, Statistical Reporting Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. U.S. Dept. Commerce. 1982. Forest Products Review, Winter/Spring. Bureau of Industrial Economics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • William J. Sheppard
    • 1
  • Brian Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Battelle Columbus LaboratoriesColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations