Biomass Utilization: Economic Analysis of a Systems Approach

  • M. Dicks
  • J.P. Doll
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 67)

Abstract

The economic feasibiity of any production process depends not only on prices but also on the possible ranges of physical possibilities and institutional permissibilities. Ideally, the economist would like to obtain from the physical scientist a set of alternative production functions that would permit analysis of all possible alternatives available in any society.

Keywords

Anaerobic Digestion Hydraulic Retention Time Methane Production Volatile Solid Waste Management System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashare, E., R.L. Wentworth, and D.L. Wise. 1979. Fuel Gas Production from Animal Residue, Part II. An Economic Assessment/Resource Recovery and Conservation, 3, 359-386.Google Scholar
  2. Buswell, A.M. and H.F. Mueller. 1952. Mechanisms of Methane Fer-Google Scholar
  3. mentation. Industry and Engineering Chemistry, 44, 550-552. Dicks, M. and M. Blase. 1982. Economic Feasibility of MethaneGoogle Scholar
  4. Production in Tunisia. M.S. thesis, University of Missouri-Google Scholar
  5. Fair, G.M. and E.W. Moore. 1937. Observations on the Digestion of Sewage Sludge Over a Wide Range of Temperatures. Sewage Works Journal, 9, 3.Google Scholar
  6. Gaddy, J.L., E.L. Park, and E.B. Rapp. 1974. Kinetics and Economics of Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Waste. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 3, 161-169.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, J.R. et al. 1979. Economics of a Swine Digester. Paper 794530, presented at the 1979 Winter Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineering.Google Scholar
  8. Geller, H. 1976. Economic Feasibility of Methane Generation on Central Mass. Dairy Farms. Science, Technology and Society Review, 2, 45.Google Scholar
  9. Hawkes, D.L. 1979. Factors Affecting Net Energy Production from Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, University College, Cardiff, Wales.Google Scholar
  10. Loehr, R.C. 1977. Pollution Control for Agriculture. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Maly, J. and H. Fadrus. 1971. Influence of Temperature on Anaerobic Digestion. Journal of Water Pollution Federal, 43, 641 - 650.Google Scholar
  12. Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. 1979. Waste Water Engineering Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 445 - 457, 610-625.Google Scholar
  13. Price, E.C. and P.W. Cheremisinoff. 1981. Biogas Production and Utilization, Chap. 1. Microbiology and Biochemistry Energy Technology Series, Ann Arbor Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Sanghi, A.K. and M. Blase. 1976. An Economic Analysis of Energy Requirements of Alternative Farming Systems for Small Farmers: Some Policy Issues. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 31, 8.Google Scholar
  15. Slane, T.C. et al 1975. An Economic Analysis of Methane Generation Feasibility on Commercial Egg Farms, Managing Livestock Wastes. Third International Symposium on Livestock Wastes.Google Scholar
  16. Stafford, D.A., D.L. Hawkes, and R. Horton. 1980. Methane Production from Waste Organic Matter. CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Stevens, M.A. and D.D. Schulte. 1979. Low Temperature Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure. Journal of Environment Engineering Division, ASCE, 105, (EE1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Dicks
    • 1
    • 2
  • J.P. Doll
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations