Characteristics of Stimulant Drug Reinforcement

  • Roy Pickens
  • Travis Thompson

Abstract

A number of stimuli serve as reinforcers for operant behavior. These stimuli unify the many and varied responses leading to their presentation, and make the behavioral unit formed more likely to recur. Apart from these effects, however, reinforcers seemingly have little else in common. They differ physically over a wide range, including such dissimilar events as food, light and novel stimulus presentation, electric shock termination, and electrical stimulation of the brain. It is not surprising therefore that the functional properties of reinforcers also differ. In fact, each reinforcer appears to have a set of unique characteristics. In the present chapter, some of the characteristics of stimulant drugs as reinforcers are examined, with special consideration given to the behavior of the organism under such conditions and to factors influencing this behavior.

Keywords

Drug Injection Drug Dependence Cocaine Dose Intake Period Abstinence Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, J. Metabolism of epinephrine and of the sympathomimetic amines. Physiol. Rev., 1959, 39, 751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis, J.D. A method for chronic intravenous infusion in freely moving rats. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 1966, 9, 385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deneau, G.A., and Inoki, R. Nicotine self-administration in monkeys. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1967, 242, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deneau, G.A., Yanagita, T., and Seevers, M.H. Self-administration of drugs by monkeys. Reported to the NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1964.Google Scholar
  5. Eddy, N.B., Halback, H., Isbell, H., and Seevers, M.H. Drug dependence: Its significance and characteristics. Bull. WHO, 1965, 32, 721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, S. The metabolic effects of epinephrine and related amines. Pharmacol. Rev., 1956, 8, 485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Estrada, U., Villarreal, J.E., and Schuster, C.R. Self-administration of stimulant drugs as a function of the dose per injection. Reported to the NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Goth, A. Medical Pharmacology. St. Louis, The C.V. Mosby Co., 1968.Google Scholar
  9. Griffith, J. A study of illicit amphetamine drug traffic in Oklahoma City. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1966, 123, 560. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffe, J.H. Drug addiction and drug abuse. In L.S. Foodman and A. Gilman, eds., The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York, The Macmillan Company, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. Jarvik, M.E. Tobacco smoking in monkeys. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1967, 142, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kosman, M.E., and Unna, K.R. Effects of chronic administration of the amphetamines and other stimulants on behavior. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 1968, 9, 240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kramer, J.C., Fischman, V.S., and Littlefield, D.C. Amphetamine abuse. JAMA, 1967, 201, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leake, C.D. The Amphetamines: Their Actions and Uses. Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 1958.Google Scholar
  15. McGuire, L.E. Reinforcing effects of intravenously-infused morphine and 1-methamphetamine. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Mississippi, 1966.Google Scholar
  16. Muscholl, E. Indirectly acting sympathomimetic amines. Pharmacol. Rev., 1966, 18, 551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pickens, R. Self-administration of stimulants by rats. The International Journal of the Addictions, 1968, 3, 215.Google Scholar
  18. Pickens, R. and Harris, W.C. Self-administration of d -amphetamine by rats. Psychopharmacologia, 1968, 12, 158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pickens, R. and Thompson, T. Self-administration of amphetamine and cocaine by rats. Reported to the NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. Pickens, R. and Thompson, T. Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: Effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 1968, 161, 122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pickens, R., Bloom, W., and Thompson, T. Response rate as a function of long session lengths and large reinforcement magnitudes. Proceedings American Psychological Association, 1969, 809–810.Google Scholar
  22. Pickens, R., Dougherty, J.A., and Thompson, T. Effects of volume and duration of infusion on cocaine reinforcement, with concurrent activity recording. Reported to the NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. Pickens, R., Meisch, R.A., and Dougherty, J.A. Effects of behavioral and biochemical manipulations on methamphetamine self-administration in the rat. Reported to the NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1968a.Google Scholar
  24. Pickens, R. , Meisch, R.A., and Dougherty, J.A. Chemical interactions in methamphetamine reinforcement. Psychol. Rep., 1968(b), 23, 1267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pickens, R. , Meisch, R., and McGuire, L.E. Methamphetamine reinforcement in rats. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 8, 371.Google Scholar
  26. Schuster, C.R., Woods, J.H., and Seevers, M.H. Self-administration of central stimulants by the monkey. Presented at Symposium on Abuse of Central Stimulants, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 1968.Google Scholar
  27. Seevers, M.H. and Deneau, G.A. Physiological aspects of tolerance and physical dependence. In W.S. Root and F.G. Hofmann, eds., Physiological Pharmacology. Volume I. New York, Academic Press, Inc., 1963, 565.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, T., and Pickens, R. Drug self-administration and conditioning. In H. Steinberg, ed., Scientific Basis of Drug Dependence. London, J. & A. Churchill, Ltd., 1968.Google Scholar
  29. Seevers, M.H. and Pickens, R. Behavioral variables influencing drug self-administration. In R.T. Harris, W.M. Mclsaac, and C.R. Schuster, eds., Drug Dependence. Austin, University of Texas Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  30. Weiss, B., and Laties, V.G. Enhancement of human performance by caffeine and the amphetamines.Pharmacol. Rev., 1962, 14, 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson, M.C., and Schuster, C.R. Pharmacological modification of the self-administration of cocaine and SPA in the rhesus monkey. Reported to the NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1968.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, M.C., Hitomi, M., and Schuster, C.R. Further studies of the self-administration of psychomotor stimulants in the rhesus monkey. Reported to the Committee on Problems ofDrug Dependence, 1969.Google Scholar
  33. Woods, J.H., and Schuster, C.R. Reinforcement properties of morphine, cocaine, and SPA as a function of unit dose. The International Journal of the Addictions, 1968, 3, 231.Google Scholar
  34. Yanagita, T., Deneau, G.A., and Seevers, M.H. Evaluation of pharmacologic agents in the monkey by long term intravenous self or programmed administration. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, 1965, 87, 453.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy Pickens
    • 1
  • Travis Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Psychiatry and PharmacologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations