H-2 Antigens pp 385-390 | Cite as

Mixed Bone Marrow Chimeras as an Approach to Transplantation Tolerance

  • Megan Sykes
  • Caroline H. Chester
  • David H. Sachs
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 144)

Abstract

Transplantation tolerance across a complete MHC barrier can be achieved in mice using lethal irradiation followed by reconstitution with a mixture of T-cell-depleted (TCD) syngeneic and allogeneic bone marrow cells.1,2 Such animals repopulate as stable mixed lymphohematopoietic chimeras, and enjoy improved survival compared with recipients of allogeneic TCD marrow alone,3 probably due, in part, to the improved immunocompetence they demonstrate.3 In addition, such animals are free from any clinical sign of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and this is also the case even if T-cells are not removed from the allogeneic marrow.4 Experiments in which allogeneic spleen cells were added to the donor inoculum to intentionally produce GVHD indicated that the syngeneic TCD component of the bone marrow inoculum improved the survival of such animals, presumably due to protection from GVHD.4 The data presented in this paper address the possible mechanism of this protective effect. We show that the syngeneic marrow inoculum provides a source of precursor cells which, in recipient spleens, develop the ability to suppress the generation of cytolytic activity by mature T-lymphocytes. We also demonstrate an enhanced protection from GVHD when the syngeneic TCD inoculum is allowed to develop its suppressive activity spontaneously in the recipient before the allogeneic inoculum is given. Such protection could have potential clinical applications.

Keywords

Suppressor Cell Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Transplantation Tolerance Total Lymphoid Irradiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Singer, K. S. Hathcock, and R. J. Hodes, Self recognition in allogeneic radiation bone marrow chimeras: A radiation-resistant host element dictates the self specificity and immune response gene phenotype, J. Exp. Med. 153: 1286 (1981).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. T. Ilstad, and D. H. Sachs, Reconstitution with syngeneic plus allogeneic or xenogeneic bone marrow leads to specific acceptance of allografts or xenografts, Nature (Lond.) 307: 168 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. T. Ildstad, S. M. Wren, S. A. Barbieri, and D. H. Sachs, Characterization of mixed allogeneic chimeras: Immunocompetence, in vitro reactivity, and genetic specificity of tolerance, J. Exp. Med. 162: 231 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. T. Ildstad, S. M. Wren, J. A. Bluestone, S. A. Barbieri, D. Stephany, and D. H. Sachs, Effect of selective depletion of host and/or donor bone marrow on lymphopoietic repopulation, tolerance, and graft-vshost disease in mixed allogeneic chimeras (B10+B10.D2->B10), J. Immunol. 136: 28 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. J. Tutschka, P. F. Ki, W. E. Beschorner, A. D. Hess, and G. W. Santos, Suppressor cells in transplantation tolerance. 2. Maturation of suppressor cells in the bone marrow chimera, Transplantation (Baltimore) 32: 321 (1981).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. L. Wood, and A. P. Monaco, Suppressor cells in specific unresponsiveness to skin allografts in ALS-treated, marrow-injected mice. Transplantation 29: 196 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Maki, R. Gottschalk, M. L. Wood, and A. P. Monaco, Specific unresponsiveness to skin allografts in antilymphocyte serum-treated, marrow-injected mice: Participation of donor marrow-derived T cells, J. Immunol. 127: 1433, (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Dorsch, and B. Roser, Suppressor cells in transplantation tolerance. 2. Identification and probable mode of action of chimeric suppressor cells. Transplantation 33: 525 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. G. Miller, An immunological suppresor cell inactivating cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor cells recognizing it, Nature (Lond.) 287: 544 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Muraoka, and R. G. Miller, Cells in bone marrow and in T cell colonies grown from bone marrow can suroress generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed against their self antigens, J. Exp. Med. 152: 54 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Muraoka, and R. G. Miller, Cells in murine fetal liver and in lymphoid colonies grown from fetal liver can suppress generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed against their self antigens, J. Immunol. 131: 45 (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. P. King, S. Strober, and H. S. Kaplan, Suppression of the mixed lymphocyte response and of graft-vs-host disease by spleen cells following total lymphoid irradiation (TLI), J. Immunol. 126: 1140 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Okada, and S. Strober, Spleen cells from adult mice given total lymphoid irradiation or from newborn mice have similar regulatory effects in the mixed lymphocyte reaction. 1. Generation of antigen-specific suppressor cells in the mixed lymphocyte reaction after the addition of spleen cells from adult mice given total lymphoid irradiation, J. Exp. Med. 156: 522 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Weigensberg, S. Morecki, L. Weiss, Z. Fuks, and S. Slavin, Suppression of cell-mediated immune responses after total lymphoid irradiation (TLI). 1. Characterization of suppressor cells of the mixed lymphocyte reaction, J. Immunol. 132: 971 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Oseroff, S. Okada, and S. Strober, Natural suppressor (NS) cells found in the spleen of neonatal mice and adult mice given total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) express the null surface phenotype. J. Immunol. 132: 101 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Maier, J. H. Holda, and H. N. Claman, Graft-vs-host reactions (GVHR) across minor murine histocompatibility barriers. 2. Development of natural suppressor cell activity, J. Immunol. 135: 1644 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Dorshkind, and C. Rosse, Physical, biologic and phenotypic properties of natural regulatory cells in murine bone marrow, Am. J. Anatomy 164: 1 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Sykes, C. H. Chester, and D. H. Sachs, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. J. Martin, J. A. Hansen, C. D. Buckner, J. E. Sanders, H. J. Deeg, P. Stewart, F. R. Appelbaum, R. Clift, A. Fefer, R. P. Witherspoon, M. S. Kennedy, K. M. Sullivan, N. Flournoy, R. Storb, and E. D. Thomas, Effects of in vitro depletion of T cells in HLA-identical allogeneic marrow grafts, Blood 66: 664 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. C. B. Soderling, C. W. Song, B. R. Blazar, and D. A. Vallera, A correlation between conditioning and engraftment in MHC-mismatched T cell-depleted murine bone marrow transplants, J. Immunol. 135: 941 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan Sykes
    • 1
  • Caroline H. Chester
    • 1
  • David H. Sachs
    • 1
  1. 1.National Cancer InstituteTransplantation Biology Section Immunology Branch, DCBDBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations