H-2 Antigens pp 89-102 | Cite as

Can Heterozygote Advantage Account for the Maintenance of H-2 Polymorphisms

  • Wayne K. Potts
  • C. Jo Manning
  • Ammon B. Peck
  • Marjorie Price-LaFace
  • Edward K. Wakeland
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 144)

Abstract

Discovering the forces that maintain the extreme polymorphisms found at loci within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is critical to understanding the role of MHC gene products in nature. It is often assumed that MHC polymorphisms are maintained in natural populations by heterozygote advantage. The feasibility of this assumption is examined by applying population genetics models developed by Sewall Wright to relevant parameters for the MHC of Mus musculus (H-2). The parameters that affect the number of alleles that can be maintained (assuming random mating) are effective population size (Ne), mutation rate (p), and the selection against homozygotes relative to heterozygotes (s). The number of alleles that can be maintained for various combinations of Ne, p, and s are presented graphically. Even with extreme parameter values maximizing the number of alleles at equilibrium (Ne=100, p=10−4, s=1) only about seven alleles can be maintained within local populations. More commonly accepted sets of parameters indicate that heterozygote advantage could only account for the maintenance of four to five alleles. An analysis of previously published data suggest that local populations carry approximately ten alleles at both the K and D loci. These results indicate that either our estimates of the relevant parameters and number of alleles actually maintained contain significant errors, or that factors other than heterozygote advantage contribute to the maintenance of H-2 polymorphisms. We briefly review a number of mechanisms other than heterozygote advantage that could play a role in the maintenance of MHC polymorphisms, including frequency dependent selection, variation in pathogen assemblages across space and time, mating preferences, and transmission distortion. We present data from a retrospective analysis of backcross and F2 matings made during the early development of H-2 homozygous lines that show transmission distortion leading to a 52% deficiency of H-2 homozygotes (n=80, p<.002). This level of transmission distortion would contribute significantly to the maintenance of H-2 polymorphisms.

Keywords

Major Histocompatibility Complex Frequency Dependent Selection Wild Mouse Major Histocompatibility Complex Allele Major Histocompatibility Complex Diversity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Batten, C.A. and R.J. Berry, 1967, Prenatal mortality in wild-caught house mice, J. Anim. Ecol. 36:453–463.Google Scholar
  2. Baxevanis, C.N., D. Wernet, Z.A. Nagy, P.H. Maurer, and J. Klein, 1980, Genetic control of T-cell proliferation responses to poly(glu40 ala60) and poly(glu51 lys34 tyr15): Subregion-specific inhibition of the responses with monoclonal Ia antibodies, Immunogenet. 11: 617–628.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, A.E., A.E. Semprini, Z. Xiaoyu, and J.F. Quebbeman, 1985, Pregnancy outcome in human couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions: HLA antigen profiles; HLA antigen sharing; female serum MLR blocking factors; and paternal leukocyte immunizations, Exp. Clin. Immunogenet. 2:137–153.Google Scholar
  4. Benacerraf, B. and M.E. Dorf, 1976, Genetic control of specific immune responses and immune suppressions by I-region genes, Cold Springs Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 41:465–475.Google Scholar
  5. Benoist, C.O., D.J. Mathis, M.R. Kanter, V.E. Williams II, and H.O. McDevitt, 1983, Regions of allelic hypervariability in the murine Aa immune response gene, Cell, 34: 169–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, R.J., 1981, Population dynamics of the house mouse, pp. 395–425, in “Biology of the House Mouse”, R.J. Berry, ed., Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  7. Billingham, R.E. and W.K. Silvers, 1959, Inbred animals and tissue transplantation immunity, Transpl. Bull. ’(Plas. Recon. Surg.) 6:399–403.Google Scholar
  8. Bischof, P., M. Jeannet, B. Bourrit, P. Vuagnat, W.L. Herrmann, and P.C. Sizonenko, 1985, Mating is random, Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. Microbiol. 7: 124–126.Google Scholar
  9. Black, F.L. and F.M. Salzano, 1981, Evidence for heterosis in the HLA system, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 33: 894–899.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bodmer, W.F., 1972, Evolutionary significance of the HL-A system, Nature 237:139–145.Google Scholar
  11. von Boehmer, H., C.G. Fathman, and W. Haas, 1977, H-2 gene complementation in cytotoxic T-cell responses of female against male cells, Eur. J. Immunol. 7: 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boue, J., A. Boue, and P. Lazar, 1975, Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions, Teratol. 12: 11–26.Google Scholar
  13. Bowman, J.C. and D.S. Falconer, 1960, Inbreeding depression and heterosis of litter size in mice, Genet. Res. Camb. 1: 262–274.Google Scholar
  14. Boyce, E.A., G.K. Beauchamp, and K. Yamakazi, 1983, The sensory perception of genotypic polymorphism of the major histocompatibility complex and other genes: some physiological and phylogenetic implications, Hum. Immunogenet. 6: 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bubbers, J.E., K.J. Blank, H.A. Freedman, and F. Lilly, 1977, Mechanisms of the H-2 effect on viral leukemogenesis, Scand. J. Immunol. 6:533–539. Clarke, B. and D.R.S. Kirby, 1966, Maintenance of histocompatibility polymorphisms, Nature 211: 999–1000.Google Scholar
  16. Conner, J.L. and M.J. Bellucci, 1979, Natural selection resisting inbreeding depression in captive wild housemice (Mus musculus), Evol. 33:927–940.Google Scholar
  17. Cudworth, A.G., E. Wolf, A.N. Gorsuch, H. Festenstein, 1979, A new look at HLA genetics with particular reference to Type-1 Diabetes, Lancet îi:389–391.Google Scholar
  18. Degos, L., J. Colombani, A. Chaventre, B. Bengston, and A. Jacquard, 1974, Selective pressure on HLA polymorphism, Nature 249: 62–63.Google Scholar
  19. Doherty, P.C. and R.M. Zinkernagel, 1975, Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex, Nature 256: 50–52.Google Scholar
  20. Dorf, M.E. and B. Benacerraf, 1975, Complementation of H-2-linked Ir genes in the mouse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 72:3671–3675.Google Scholar
  21. Drife, J.O., 1983, What proportion of pregnancies are spontaneously aborted? Brit. Med. Journal 286: 294.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan, W.R., E.K. Wakeland, and J. Klein, 1979, Heterozygosity of H-2 loci in wild mice, Nature 281: 603–605.Google Scholar
  23. Estess, P., A.B. Begovich, M. Koo, P.P. Jones, and H.O. McDevitt, 1986Google Scholar
  24. Sequence analysis and structure-function correlation of murine g, k, u, s, and f haplotype I-Ab cDNA clones, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:3594–3598.Google Scholar
  25. Figueroa, F., H. Tichy, R.J. Berry, and J. Klein, 1986, MHC polymorphism in island populations of mice, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 127:100–105. Gill, T.J., 1983, Immunogenetics of spontaneous abortions in humans, Transplan. 35:1–6.Google Scholar
  26. Gill, T.J., 1985, Immunity and pregnancy, Grit. Rev. Immunol. 5: 201–227.Google Scholar
  27. Gomard, E., V. Duprez, T. Reme, M.J. Colombani, and T.P. Levy, 1977, Exclusive involvement of H-2Db or H-2Kd product in the interaction between T-killer lymphocytes and syngeneic H- 2b or H-2d viral lymphomas, J. Exp. Med., 146: 909–922.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gotze, D., J. Nadeau, E.K. Wakeland, R.J. Berry, F. Bonhomme, J.K. Egorov, J.P. Hjorth, H. Hoogstraal, J. Vives, H. Winking, and J. Klein, 1980, Histocompatibility-2 system in wild mice. X. Frequencies of H-2 and Ia antigens in wild mice from Europe and Africa, J. Immunol. 124: 2675–2681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, E., 1966, Breeding systems, pp. 11–22, in “Biology of the Laboratory Mouse”, 2nd ed., E.Green, ed., McGraw-Hill, N.Y.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, B.L., A. Hamilton, and M.S. Hamilton, 1985, Maternal-fetal disparity at multiple minor histocompatibility loci affects the weight of the feto-placental unit in mice, J. Reprod. Immunol. 8:257–261.Google Scholar
  31. Hamilton, M. and I. Hellstrom, 1978, Selection for histoincompatible progeny in mice, Biol. Reprod. 19:267–270.Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, W.D., 1982, Pathogens as causes of genetic diversity in their host populations, pp. 269–296, in “Population Biology of Infectious Diseases, Dahlem Konferenzen, R.M. Anderson and R.M. May, eds., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  33. Hartl, D., 1980, “Principles of Population Genetics”, Sinauer, Sunderland. Hedrick, P.W., 1972, Maintenance of genetic variation with a frequency dependent selection model as compared to the overdominant model, Genetics 72: 771–775.Google Scholar
  34. Hedrick, P.W. and G. Thomson, 1983, Evidence for balancing selection at HLA, Genet. 104: 449–456.Google Scholar
  35. Henson, V., N. Maclaren, W. Winter, W. Riley, J. Rotter, and E.K. Wakeland, 1986, Molecular genetics of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Mol. Biol. Med., 3:129–136.Google Scholar
  36. Hings, I.M. and R.E. Billingham, 1981, Splenectomy and sensitization of Fischer female rats favors histoincompatibility of R2 back-cross progeny, Transplan. Proc. 13:1253–1255.Google Scholar
  37. Hings, I.M. and R.E. Billingham, 1983, Parity-induced changes in the frequency of RT1 heterozygotes in an R2 backcross, Transplan. Proc. 15:900–902.Google Scholar
  38. Hings I. and R.E. Billingham, 1985, Maternal-fetal immune interactions and the maintenance of major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the rat, J. Reprod. Immunol. 7:337–350.Google Scholar
  39. Hunziker, R.D. and T.G. Wegmann, 1986, Placental immunoregulation, CRC Crit. Rev. Immunol. 6: 245–285.Google Scholar
  40. Ishii, N., C.N. Baxevanis, Z.A. Nagy, and J. Klein, 1981, Selection of H-2 molecules for the context of antigen recognition by T lymphocytes, Immunogenet. 14: 283–292.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, P., D. Murphy, and H. McDevitt, 1981, Variable synthesis and expression of Eu and AE(Eß) Ia polypeptide chains in mice of different H-2 haplotypes, Immunogenet. 12: 321–337.Google Scholar
  42. Kappler, J.W., T. Wade, J. White, E. Kushnir, J. Bill, N. Roehm, and P. Marrack, 1987, A T cell receptor Vß segment which imparts reactivity to a class II major histocompatibility complex product, Cell, 49: 263–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kimura, M. and J.F. Crow, 1964, The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population, Genetics 49: 725–738.Google Scholar
  44. Klein, J.: H-2 mutations: Their genetics and effect on immune function. Adv. Immunol. 26: 55–146, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klein, J., 1986, “Natural History of the Major Histocompatibility Complex”, Wiley, N.Y.Google Scholar
  46. Klein, J. and F. Figueroa, 1981, Polymorphism of the mouse H-2 loci, Immunol. Rev., 60: 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klitz, W., G. Thomson, and M.P. Baur, 1984, The nature of selection in the HLA region based on population data from the ninth workshop, pp. 330–332, in “Histocompatibility Testing 1984”, E.D. Albert, M.P. Baur, and W.R. Mayr, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  48. Larhammar, D., L. Schenning, K. Gustaffson, K. Wiman, L. Claesson, L. Rask, and P.A. Peterson, 1982, Complete amino acid sequence of an HLA-DR antigen-like beta chain as predicted from the nucleotide sequence: similarities with immunoglobins and HLA-A, B, C antigens, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79:3687–1500.Google Scholar
  49. Lewontin, R.C., L. R. Ginzburg, and S.D. Tuljapurkar, 1978, Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism Genet. 88: 149–170.Google Scholar
  50. Loeb, L., H.D. King, and H.T. Blumenthal, 1943, Transplantation and individuality differences in inbred strains of rats, Biol. Bull. 84:1–12.Google Scholar
  51. Lynch,C.B., 1977, Inbreeding effects upon animals derived from a wild population of Mus musculus, Evol. 31:526–537.Google Scholar
  52. Malissen, M., T. Hunkapiller, L. Hood, 1983, Nucleotide sequence of a light chain gene of the mouse I-A subregion: A-beta, Science 221: 750–754.Google Scholar
  53. Matis, L.S., P.P. Jones, D.B. Murphy, S.M. Hedrick, E.A. Lerner, C.A. Janeway, Jr., J.M. McNicholas, R.H. Schwartz, 1982, Immune response gene function correlates with the expression of an Ia antigen. II. A quantitative deficiency in Ae:E0 complex expression causes a corresponding defect in antigen-presenting cell function, J. Exp. Med. 155: 508–523.Google Scholar
  54. Mengle-Gaw, L. and H.O. McDevitt, 1985, Genetics and expression of mouse Ia antigens, Ann. Rev. Immunol. 3: 367–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mowbray, J.F., H. Liddell, J.L. Underwood, C. Gibbings, P.W. Reginald, and R.W. Beard, 1985, Controlled trial of treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion by immunisation with paternal cells, Lancet 1: 941–943.Google Scholar
  56. Nadeau, J.H., E.K. Wakeland, D. Gotze, and J. Klein, 1981, The population genetics of the H-2 polymorphism in European and North African populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus), Genet. Res. Camb. 37: 17–31.Google Scholar
  57. Ober, C., A. Martin, J. Simpson, W. Hauck, D. Amos, D. Kostyu, M. Fotino, and F. Allen, Jr., 1983, Shared HLA antigens and reproductive performance among Hutterites, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 35: 994–1004.Google Scholar
  58. Ober, C., W.W. Hauck, E. O’Brien, D.D. Kostyu, S. Elias, L. Cohen, R. Radvany, R. Anderson, J. Simpson, A.O. Martin, 1984, Decreased fertility among Hutterites sharing HLA-DR antigens, Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 36: 130s.Google Scholar
  59. O’Brien, S.J., M.E. Roelke, L. Marker, A. Newman, C.A. Winkler, D. Meltzer, L. Colly, J.F. Evermann, M. Bush, and D.E. Wildt, 1985, Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah, Science 227: 1428–1434.Google Scholar
  60. Palm, J. 1969, Association of maternal genotype and excess heterozygosity for Ag-B histocompatibility antigens among male rats, Trans. Proc. 1:82–84.Google Scholar
  61. Palm, J., 1970, Maternal-fetal interactions and histocompatibility antigen polymorphisms, Trans. Proc. 2:162–173.Google Scholar
  62. Palm, J., 1974, Maternal-fetal histoincompatibility in rats: An escape from adversity, Can. Res., 34: 2061–2065.Google Scholar
  63. Pease, L.R., D.H. Schulze, G.M. Pfaffenbach, and S.G. Nathenson, 1983, Spontaneous H-2 mutants provide evidence that a copy mechanism analogous to gene conversion generates polymorphism in the major histocompatibility complex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:242–246.Google Scholar
  64. Pollack, M.S., C.J. Wysocki, G.K. Beauchamp, D. Braun Jr., C. Callaway, and B. Dupont, 1982, Absence of HLA association or linkage for variations in sensitivity to odor of androstenone, Immunogenet. 15: 579–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rodriguez, G., G. Andersson, H. Wigzell, and A. Peck, 1979, Non-T cell nature of the naturally occurring, spleen associated suppressor cells present in the newborn mouse, Eur. J. Immunol. 9: 737–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenberg, L.T., D. Cooperman, and R. Payne, 1983, HLA and mate selection, Immunogenet. 17: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sage, R.D., 1981, Wild mice, pp. 39–90, in “The Mouse in Biomedical Research”, Vol.I, H.L. Foster, J.D. Small, J.G. Fox, eds., Academic, N.Y. Schwartz, R.H., C.S. David, D.H. Sachs, and W.E. Paul, 1976, T lymphocyte-enriched murine peritoneal exudate cells III. Inhibition with anti-Ia antisera, J. Immunol. 117: 531–540.Google Scholar
  68. Shonnard, J.W., B.K. Davis, D.V. Cramer, S.F. Radka, and T.J. Gill III,1979, The association of immune responsiveness, mixed lymphocyte responses, and Ia antigens in natural populations of Norway rats, J. Immunol. 123: 778–783.Google Scholar
  69. Simpson, E. and R.D. Gordon, 1977, Responsiveness to H-Y antigen Ir gene complementation and target cells, Immunol. Rev., 35: 59–75.Google Scholar
  70. Solinger, A.M., M.E. Ultee, E. Margoliash, and R.H. Schwartz, 1979, T-lymphocyte response to cytochrome c. I. Demonstration of a T-cell heteroclitic proliferative response and identification of a topographic antigenic determinant on pigeon cytochrome c whose immune recognition requires two complementing major histocompatibility complex-linked immune response genes, J. Exp. Med., 150: 830–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Takakuwa, K., K. Kanazawa, and S. Takeuchi, 1986, Production of blocking antibodies by vaccination with husband’s lymphocytes in unexplained recurrent aborters: the role in successful pregnancy, Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. and Microbiol. 10: 1–9.Google Scholar
  72. Taylor, C. and W.P. Faulk, 1981, Prevention of recurrent abortion with leucocyte transfusions, Lancet iî:68–70.Google Scholar
  73. Thomas, M.L., J.H. Harger, D.K. Wagner, B.S. Rabin, and T.J. Gill, 1985, HLA sharing and spontaneous abortion in humans, Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 151: 1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tiwari, J.L. and P.I. Terasaki, 1985, “HLA and Disease Associations”, Springer-Verlag, N.Y.Google Scholar
  75. Treisman, M., 1981, The significance of immunity restriction by the major histocompatibility complex, and of the occurrence of high polymorphism at MHC loci: Two hypotheses, J. Theor. Biol. 89:409–421.Google Scholar
  76. Vadheim, C.M., J.I. Rotter, N.K. Maclaren, W.J. Riley, and C.E. Anderson: Selective transmission of insulin dependent diabetes genes? Pediat. Res., 19: A255.Google Scholar
  77. Wakeland, E.K. and J. Klein, 1981, The polymorphism of I region encoded antigens among wild mice, Curr. Trends in Histocompatibility 4: Wakeland, E.K. and J.H. Nadeau, 1980, Immune responsiveness and polymorphism of the major histocompatibility complex: an interpretation, pp. 149–156, in “Strategies of Immune Regulation”, E. I. Sercarz and A.J. Cunningham, eds., Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  78. Wakeland, E.K., M. Price-LaFace, V. Henson, and A.B. Peck, 1987, Production of 35 H-2 homozygous strains from wild mice, Immunogenet. (in press).Google Scholar
  79. Wallace, M.E., 1981, The breeding, inbreeding and management of wild mice, pp. 183–204, in “Biology of the House Mouse”, R.J. Berry, ed., Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  80. Watterson, G.A., 1977, Heterosis or neutrality? Genet. 85: 789–814.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Widera, G. and R.A. Flavell, 1984, The nucleotide sequence of the murine I-Eß6 immune gene: evidence for gene conversion events in class II genes of the major histocompatibility complex, EMBO J., 3: 1221–1225.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams, R.M., L.J. Kraus, P.T. Lavin, L.L. Steele, and E.J. Yunis, 1981, Genetics of survival in mice: localization of dominant effects to subregions of the major histocompatibility complex, pp. 247–266, in “Immunological Aspects of Ageing”, E. Segre and L. Smith, eds., Marcel Dekker, N.Y.Google Scholar
  83. Wright, S., 1939, The distribution of self-sterility alleles in populations, Genet. 24: 538–552.Google Scholar
  84. Wright, S., 1960, On the number of self-incompatibility alleles maintained in equilibrium by a given mutation rate in a population of a given size: A re-examination, Biometrics 16: 61–85.Google Scholar
  85. Wright. S., 1969, “Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies”, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  86. Yamakazi, K., E.A. Boyse, V. Mike, H.T. Thaler, B.J. Mathieson, J. Abbott, J. Boyse, Z.A. Zayas, and L. Thomas, 1976, Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex, J. Exp. Med., 144: 1324–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yunis, E.J., A.L. Watson, R.S. Gelman, S.J. Sylvia, R. Bronson, M.E. Dorf, 1984, Traits that influence longevity in mice, Genet. 108: 999–1011.Google Scholar
  88. Zinkernagel, R.M., 1979, Associations between major histocompatibility antigens and susceptibility to disease, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 33: 201–213.Google Scholar
  89. Zinkernagel R.M. and P.C. Doherty, 1974, Restriction of in vitro T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in lymphocytic choriomeningitis within a syngeneic or semiallogeneic system, Nature 248: 701–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne K. Potts
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Jo Manning
    • 3
  • Ammon B. Peck
    • 1
  • Marjorie Price-LaFace
    • 1
  • Edward K. Wakeland
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of PathologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations