Ecospace Utilization and Guilds in Marine Communities through the Phanerozoic

  • R. K. Bambach
Part of the Topics in Geobiology book series (TGBI, volume 3)

Abstract

Does the ecological theater influence the staging of the evolutionary play? What roles do biotic interactions have in influencing evolutionary patterns? This chapter presents a system of ecologic analysis for paleocommunities that reveals some relationships between the utilization of ecospace and change in diversity through time. The analysis is restricted to marine shelf faunas. The data base for marine faunas is the most voluminous available. These faunas have been emphasized in community paleoecology because of the relatively complete fossil record of shallow marine habitats. Recent studies summarizing diversity patterns for the Phanerozoic have also concentrated on the marine realm.

Keywords

Species Richness Fossil Record Middle Devonian Late Ordovician Fossil Assemblage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bambach, R. K., 1977, Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic, Paleobiology 3: 152–167.Google Scholar
  2. Crimes, T. P., 1974, Colonization of the early ocean floor, Nature (London) 248: 328–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hairston, N. G., 1981, An experimental test of a guild: Salamander competition, Ecology 62: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holmes, R. T., Bonney, R. E., Jr., and Pacala, S. W., 1979, Guild structure of the Hubbard Brook bird community: Multivariate approach, Ecology 60: 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutchinson, G. E., 1965, The Ecological Theater and the Evolutionary Play, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  6. Kohn, A. J., 1959, The ecology of Conus in Hawaii, Ecol. Monogr. 29: 47–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller, J. C., 1980, Niche relationships among parasitic insects occurring in a temporary habitat, Ecology 61: 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Noon, B. R., 1981, The distribution of an avian guild along a temperate elevational gradient: The importance and expression of competition, Ecol. Monogr. 51: 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peterson, C. H., 1976, Relative abundance of living and dead molluscs in two California coastal lagoons, Lethaia 9: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Raup, D. M., 1976, Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: A tabulation, Paleobiology 2: 279288.Google Scholar
  11. Raup, D. M., 1978, Cohort analysis of generic survivorship, Paleobiology 4: 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Root, R. B., 1967, The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher, Ecol. Monogr. 37: 317–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Seilacher, A., 1977, Evolution of trace fossil communities, in: Patterns of Evolution ( A. Hallam, ed.), pp. 359–376, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  14. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1978, A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. I. Analysis of marine orders, Paleobiology 4: 223–251.Google Scholar
  15. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1979, A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria, Paleobiology 5: 222–251.Google Scholar
  16. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1980, The three great evolutionary faunas of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 12: 520.Google Scholar
  17. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1981, A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic: marine fossil record, Paleobiology 7: 36–53.Google Scholar
  18. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W., 1981, Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record, Nature (London) 293: 435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stanley, S. M., and Campbell, L. D.. 1981, Neogene mass extinction of western Atlantic molluscs, Nature (London) 293: 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Valentine, J. W., 1969, Patterns of taxonomic and ecological structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time. Palaeontology 12: 684–709.Google Scholar
  21. Wagner, J. L., 1981, Seasonal change in guild structure: Oak woodland insectivorous birds, Ecology 62: 973–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walker, K. R., and Bambach, R. K., 1971, The significance of fossil assemblages from fine-grained sediments: Time-averaged communities, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 3: 783–784.Google Scholar

References: Data Sources for Species Lists Used in Guild Analysis

  1. Ager, D. V., 1963, Principles of Paleoecology, McGraw—Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bambach, R. K., 1969, Bivalvia of the Siluro-Devonian Arisaig Group, Nova Scotia, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  3. Bambach, R. K., Deemer, E. J., and Lewis, S. J., 1974, Community paleoecology of a turbulent environment: The basal Cloyd Conglomerate (Lower Miss.) in Montgomery and Pulaski counties Virginia, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Progr. 6: 330–331 (and unpublished data).Google Scholar
  4. Bayer, T. N., 1967, Repetitive benthonic community in the Maquoketa Formation (Ordovician) of Minnesota, J. Paleontol. 41: 417–422.Google Scholar
  5. Bretsky, P. W., 1970, Upper Ordovician ecology of the central Appalachians, Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. Yale Univ. Bull. 34.Google Scholar
  6. Copper, P., and Grawbarger, D. J., 1978, Paleoecological succession leading to a Late Ordovician biostrome on Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Can. J. Earth Sci. 15: 1987–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBar, J. R., and Beardsley, D. W., 1961, Paleoecology of the Choctawhatchee deposits (Late Miocene) at Alum Bluff Florida, Southeast. Geol. 2: 155–189.Google Scholar
  8. DuBar, J. R., and Chaplin, J. R., 1963, Paleoecology of the Pamlico Formation (Late Pleistocene); Nixonville Quadrangle, Horry County, South Carolina, Southeast. Geol. 4: 127–165.Google Scholar
  9. DuBar, J. R., and Taylor, D. S., 1962, Paleoecology of the Choctawhatchee deposits, Jackson Bluff, Florida, Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. 12: 349–376.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, L., 1962, The paleoecology of a Lower Carboniferous marine transgression, J. Paleontol. 36: 1090–1107.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, J. N., 1970, The paleoecology of the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian) in southeastern New York State, unpublished honors thesis (summa cum laude), Smith College.Google Scholar
  12. Gernant, R. E., 1970, Paleoecology of the Choptank Formation (Miocene) of Maryland and Virginia, Md. Geol. Surv. Rep. Invest. 12.Google Scholar
  13. Humphreville, R., 1981, Stratigraphy and paleoecology of the Upper Mississippian Bluefield Formation, unpublished M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  14. Hurst, J. M., 1975, Wenlock carbonate, level bottom, brachiopod dominated communities from Wales and the Welsh Borderland, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 17: 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurst, J. M., 1979, Evolution, succession and replacement in the type Upper Caradoc (Ordovician) benthic faunas of England, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 27: 189–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lane, N. G., 1973, Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (Upper Osagean: Indiana), Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 99: 1–141.Google Scholar
  17. Lesperance, P. J., and Sheehan, P. M., 1975, Middle Gaspe limestones communities on the Forillon Peninsula, Quebec (Siegenian, Lower Devonian), Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 17: 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDonald, K. B., 1975, Quantitative community analysis: Recurrent group and cluster techniques applied to the fauna of the Upper Devonian Sonyea Group, New York J. Geol. 82: 473–499.Google Scholar
  19. Makurath, J. H., 1977, Marine faunal assemblages in the Silurian—Devonian Keyser Limestone of the central Appalachians, Lethaia 10: 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazzullo, S. J., 1973, Deltaic depositional environments in the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian), southeastern New York State, J. Sediment. Petrol. 43: 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaack, G. D., 1975, Diversity and community structure of the Brush Creek marine interval (Conemaugh Group, Upper Pennsylvanian), in the Appalachian Basin of western Pennsylvania, Bull. Fla. State Mus. Biol. Ser. 19: 69–133.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, A. B., 1959, Paleoecology of a molluscan fauna from the Trent Formation, J. Paleontol. 33: 855–871.Google Scholar
  23. Stump, T. E., 1975, Pleistocene molluscan paleoecology and community structure of the Puerto Libertad region, Sonora, Mexico, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 17: 177–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Valentine, J. W., and Lipps, J. H., 1963, Late Cenozoic rocky-shore assemblages from Anacapa Island, California, J. Paleontol. 37: 1292–1302.Google Scholar
  25. Vedder, J. G., and Norris, R. M., 1963, Geology of San Nicolas Island, California, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 369.Google Scholar
  26. Watkins, R., 1973, Carboniferous faunal associations and stratigraphy, Shasta County, northern California, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 57: 1743–1764.Google Scholar
  27. Watkins, R., 1978, Silurian marine communities west of Dingle Ireland, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 23: 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watkins, R., 1979, Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland, Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol. 31 (3): 175–280.Google Scholar
  29. Ziegler, A. M., Cocks, L. R. M., and Bambach, R. K., 1968, Composition and structure of Lower Silurian marine communities, Lethaia 1: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Bambach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations