Conditioning pp 567-579 | Cite as

The Neural Integration of Feeding and Drinking Habits

  • John Garcia
  • Kenneth W. Rusiniak
  • Stephen W. Kiefer
  • Federico Bermudez-Rattoni
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 26)

Abstract

For the rat, the interaction of food-related cues and the visceral feedback following ingestion largely determines future consummatory behavior. In early work (Garcia & Koelling, 1966), it was shown that taste cues were most readily associated with illness; conditioned taste aversions were formed after only a single taste-illness experience. Unlike most other demonstrations of classical conditioning, the delay between the taste conditioned stimulus (CS) and the illness unconditioned stimulus (US) could be an hour or more and strong taste aversions still would be formed. In contrast to tastes, an audio-visual signal was a poor CS for illness conditioning, acquiring little or no aversive properties following a single toxic US. If footshock was used as a US, the converse obtained. An audio-visual CS was readily associated with footshock US whereas taste was a poor CS in shock avoidance conditioning.

Keywords

Conditioned Stimulus Unconditioned Stimulus Taste Aversion Neural Integration Odor Aversion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin, R.M. and Akert, K. 1959. Cortical and thalamic areas involved in taste discrimination in the albino rat. J. Comp. Neur. 111: 231.Google Scholar
  2. Bermudez-Rattoni, F., Rusiniak, K.W. and Garcia, J. 1981. Conditioned flavor aversion: Disruption of odor-taste potentiation by reversible amygdala lesion. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Society for Neuroscience, Abs., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  3. Borison, H.L. and Wang, S.C. 1953. Physiology and pharmacology of vomiting. Pharmacol. Rev. 5: 193.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, J.J., Slick, T.B. and Lorden, J.F. 1972. Involvement of gustatory neocortex in the learning of taste aversions. Physiol. Behay. 9: 637.Google Scholar
  5. Brett, L.P., Hankins, W.G. and Garcia, J. 1976. Prey-lithium aversions III: Buteo hawks. Behay. Biol. 17: 87.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, J.C., Westbrook, R.F. and Irwin, J. 1979. Potentiation instead of overshadowing in the pigeon. Behay. Neur. Biol. 25: 18.Google Scholar
  7. Eisner, T. and Grant R.P. 1981. Toxicity, odor aversion, and “olfactory aposematism.” Sci. 213: 476.Google Scholar
  8. Garcia, J. and Ervin, F.R. 1968. Gustatory-visceral and telereceptor-cutaneous conditioning-adaptation in internal and external milieus. Comm. Behay. Biol. 1: 389.Google Scholar
  9. Garcia, J., Ervin, F.R., Yorke, C.H. and Koelling, R.A. 1967. Conditioning with delayed vitamin injections. Sci. 155: 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia, J. and Koelling, R.A. 1966. Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychon. Sci. 4: 123.Google Scholar
  11. Garcia, J., Rusiniak, K.W. and Brett, L.P. 1977. Conditioning food-illness aversions in wild animals: Caveant Cononici,In Operant-Pavlovian Interactions (H. David and H.M.B. Hurwitz, Eds.), pp. 273–316, Lawrence Erlbaum Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  12. Gelperin, A. 1975. Rapid food aversion learning by a terrestrial mollusk. Sci. 189: 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, K.F. and Garcia, J. 1971. Recuperation from illness: Flavor enhancement for rats. Sci. 173: 749.Google Scholar
  14. Grill, H.J. and Norgren, R. 1978. The taste reactivity test. I Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Res. 143: 263.Google Scholar
  15. Hankins, W.G., Garcia, J. and Rusiniak, K.W. 1974. Cortical lesions: Flavor illness and noise-chock conditioning. Behay. Biol. 10: 173.Google Scholar
  16. Kiefer, S.W., Cabral, R.J., Rusiniak, K.W. and Garcia, J. 1980. Ethanol-induced aversions in rats with subdiaphargmatic vagotomies. Behay. Neur. Biol. 29: 246.Google Scholar
  17. Kiefer, S.W. and Rusiniak, K.W. 1979. Involvement of gustatory neocortex in the rat’s neophobic and associative responses to taste and odor stimuli. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Society for Neuroscience Meeting, Abs. pg. 129, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  18. Mackintosh, N.J. 1974. The Psychology of Animal Learning, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Norgren, R. 1974. Gustatory afferents to ventral forebrain. Brain Res. 81: 285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Palmerino, C.C., Rusiniak, K.W. and Garcia, J. 1980. Flavor-illness aversions: The peculiar roles of odor and taste in memory for poison. Sci. 208: 753.Google Scholar
  21. Rusiniak, K.W., Hankins, W.G. and Garcia, J. and Brett, L.P. 1979. Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste in rats. Behay. Neur. Biol. 25: 1.Google Scholar
  22. Rusiniak, K.W., Palmerino, C.C. and Forthman, D. 1981. Odor and taste: Effects of odor location on synergistic interactions during illness and shock paradigms. Paper presented at the 61st Annual Western Psychological Association Meeting, Abs. pg. 217, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  23. Wang, S.C. and Borison, H.L., 1951. The vomiting center: A critical experimental analysis. Arch. Neur. Psych. 63: 928.Google Scholar
  24. White, L. 1965. Olfactory bulb projections of the rat. Anat. Rec. 152: 465.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Garcia
    • 1
  • Kenneth W. Rusiniak
    • 1
  • Stephen W. Kiefer
    • 1
  • Federico Bermudez-Rattoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Mental Retardation Research CenterUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations