Nonperturbative Analysis of Optical Double Resonance with Application to Phase Conjugation

  • Govind P. Agrawal
Conference paper


Optical double resonance has been extensively studied 1–7 in the context of high-resolution spectroscopy. More recently, its use has been suggested for optical bistability8, 9 and phase conjugation. 10, 11 A theoretical description of these nonlinear phenomena requires the knowledge of the response of a three-level system interacting with two resonant fields. Since optical saturation plays an important role, a nonperturbative solution of the corresponding density-matrix equations is required. In its most general form that includes Doppler broadening, arbitrary level detunings, and arbitrary relaxation rates, such a task can be accomplished only numerically. Useful analytical expressions for the nonlinear susceptibility can, however, be obtained under various simplifying assumptions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. R. Schlossberg and A. Javan, Phys. Rev. 150, 267 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. E. Notkin, S. G. Rautian, and A. A. Feoktistov, Sov. Phys. JETP 25, 1112 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. S. Feld and A. Javan, Phys. Rev. 177, 540 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Hänsch and P. Toschek, Z. Phys. 236, 213 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. S. Letokov and V. P. Chebotayev, Nonlinear Laser Spectroscopy, ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. G. Brewer and E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev. A 11, 1641 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Orriols, Nuovo Cimento 53B, 1 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. F. Walls and P. Zoller, Opt. Commun. 34, 260 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. M. Savage, H. J. Carmichael, and D. F. Walls, Opt. Commun. 42, 211 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. P. Agrawal, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-17, 2335 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. P. Agrawal, Opt. Lett. 8 (July 1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Mlynek, F. Mitschke, and W. Lange (these proceedings).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Heppner, C. 0. Weiss, U. Hübner, and G. Schinn, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-16, 392 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. P. Agrawal, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. S. Feld, M. M. Burns, T. U. Kühl, P. G. Pappas, and D. E. Murnick, Opt. Lett. 5, 79 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. L. Abrams and R. C. Lind, Opt. Lett. 2, 94 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. F. Lam and R. L. Abrams, Phys. Rev A 26, 1539 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Govind P. Agrawal
    • 1
  1. 1.Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA

Personalised recommendations