A Curriculum for General Systems Education

  • G. Arthur Mihram
  • Danielle Mihram
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 5)


The purpose of the paper is to delineate a tertiary-level (undergraduate) educational curriculum in consonance with the very purpose of the university [1]: to ensure that every graduating student has been taken to the forefront of human knowledge.


Human Knowledge Mother Tongue Educational Curriculum General System Theory English Composition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. Arthur Mihram, An Epistle to Dr. Benjamin Franklin. Exposition-University Press, New York, 1975 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Mihram and G. Arthur Mihram, “Human Knowledge: The Role of Models, Metaphors, and Analogy.” International Journal of General Systems, 1, 41–60 and 281, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. M. Ampère, Essai sur la Philosophie des Sciences. Bachellier, Paris, 1834; facsimile reprod.: Culture et Civilisation, Bruxelles, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Mihram, G. Arthur Mihram and M. Nowakowska, “The Modem Origins of the Term, ‘Cybernetics’.” To appear, 1977 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Wiener, “Cybernetics in History.” In: The Human Use of Human Beings, by N. Wiener; Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1953.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. G. Miller, Living Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. G. Kendall and A. Stuart, The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Hafner, London, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. A. Mihram, “Simulation Methodology.” Theory and Decision, 7, 67–94, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. A. Mihram, “Simulation and Scientific Inference.” In: Selected Papers on Simulation, edited by R. Chattergy, Western, Los Angeles, pp. 1–13, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. E. Boulding, “Truth or Power?” Science, 190, 423, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. K. Morton, “The world of fragmentariness.” Improving College and University Teaching, 24, No. 3, 175–176, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. P. Ashby, “General Systems Theory as a New Discipline,” General Systems, 3, 1–6, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Diderot, “Avant-Propos,” Encyclopedia ou Dictionnaire Raisonne des Sciences, des Arts et des Metiérs, Briasson, Paris, Vol. I.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. G. Kendall, “The Teaching of Operations Research in the U.S.A.,” Operational Research Quarterly, 5, 43–48, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. W. Engstrom, “Systems Engineering—A Growing Concept,” Electrical Engineering, 76, 113–116, 1957.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. D. Hall, A Methodology for Systems Engineering. Van Nostrand, Princeton (N.J.), 1962.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Bonder, “Operations Research Education: Some Requirements and Deficiencies,” Operations Research, 21, 796–809, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. R. Scott, “Engineers Are Slipping,” IEEE Spectrum, 10, 1973 (August), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. J. Klir, “On General Systems Education,” Journal of Systems Engineering, 4, 14–19, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. L. Arnoff, “Are We Gambling on OR/MS Education?” Interfaces, 6, No. 3, 104–115, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. B. Haley, “Operational Research and Education,” Operations Research Quarterly, 27, 193–198, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Arthur Mihram
    • 1
  • Danielle Mihram
    • 1
  1. 1.HaverfordUSA

Personalised recommendations