Analysis of Investment in Technology Development and Systems with Variable Structure

  • Boris S. Verkhovsky
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 5)


Constantly increasing demands for natural resources such as energy, materials, water, etc. lead more and more decision makers to consider the natural resources as constraints for economic growth [Verkhovsky and Volin 1965, Brookes 1973, Rausser 1974, Roman 1974, Magdoff 1976]. There are many interrelated management problems associated with investment in research and development of technology and/or conservation programs. However, most of these problems deal directly with the evaluation of capital investment in technology development and conservation in terms of criteria related to economic growth. In our study we consider two stages simultaneously: first, investments which change resource consumption by subdivisions, and second, improvements in efficiency which are related to economic criteria. This method enables the decision maker to systemically evaluate capital investments in technology developments in the case where a number of subsystems are competing for the same resources. The model can also be used to determine the optimal allocation of capital into resource development. Since the objective of this paper is the development of a methodology, no specific technologies are being discussed.


Technology Development Budgetary Constraint Capital Investment Resource Consumption Economic Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Bellman, Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Bellman, and S. E. Dreyfus, Applied Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. G. Brookes, “Energy Resources and World Economic Growth,” Long Range Planning 6:39–43, September, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. W. Kuhn, and A. W. Tucker, “Nonlinear Programming,” Proc. Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 481–492, 1951.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Magdoff, “Capital, Technology and Development,” Monthly R., 27:1–11, January, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. C. Rausser, “Technological Change, Production and Investment in Natural Resources Industries,” Am. Econ. R., 64:1049–1059, December, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Roman, “Technology, The Key to Market Expansion for Developing Countries,” Ind. Marketing Mgt., 3:167–174, March, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. S. Verkhovsky, “Analysis of Investment in Development,” Management Science, (in editorial process, submitted August, 1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. S. Verkhovsky, “Investments in Technology Development and Multiparametric Programming,” International Journal of System Science, 1977a (in editorial process).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. S. Verkhovsky, “Analysis of Pricing, Marketing and Technology under Resources Conservation,” ORSA/TIMS Bulletin N.3, San Francisco, May 1977b.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. S. Verkhovsky, “Marketing Analysis and Investments in Development (MAID),” ORSA/TIMS Bulletin N.4, November, 1977c, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. S. Verkhovsky, and Yu. M. Volin, “On One Class of Problems Related to Optimal Economic Programming,” Economical and Mathematical Methods, Vol, 2, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 121–140, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris S. Verkhovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Eng./Applied SciencePrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations