A Dynamic Model for Society
This idea is a generalisation which somehow seems to background everything else under discussion. The idea is captured from the longest-focus setting of our systemic spectacles. “Things” are “things” because they are relatively unchanging. In analysing them we discern various mechanisms which seem to us to cause them to “unchange,” to be “things” and thus to survive. It is, of course, not clear whether they “owe” their survival to such mechanisms as a prime cause, or, that they themselves in a sense are the mechanisms which are just happening to reduce change and are thus inseparable from and inherent in, the things we perceive.
KeywordsTrade Union Coercive Power Eastern Bloc Trade Union Membership Power Drift
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.V. H. Brix, Cybernetics and Social Structure, Progress of Cybernetics, Gordon & Breach, Vol. 3, pp. 1107–1120, 1970.Google Scholar
- 2.V. H. Brix, The Struggle for Control, In: Modern Trends in Cybernetics & Systems, Lange & Springer, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
- 3.V. H. Brix, Homeostasis in the Two-Person System, Paper given at the Third European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vienna, 1976.Google Scholar
- 4.Elliott Jaques, A General Theory of Bureaucracy, Heinemann, 1976.Google Scholar
- 5.R. W. Revans, Helping Each Other to Help the Helpless, Kybernetes, Vol. 4, Nos. 3 and 4, 1975.Google Scholar
- 6.Hedrick Smith, The Russians, Sphere Books Ltd, London, 19/6.Google Scholar
- 7.V. H. Brix, and R. L. Clarke, A Study of Social Systems, International Congress of Cybernetics & Systems, Oxford, U.K., 1972, Advances in Cybernetics & Systems, Gordon & Breach, 1974.Google Scholar