Skip to main content

Succinct Representation in Neural Nets and General Systems

  • Chapter
Applied General Systems Research

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((SYSC,volume 5))

Abstract

Most large systems can be described in terms which imply that their viability is due to their ability to adapt to environmental changes. It is probably impossible to define adaptation in a way which is both rigorous and consistent with intuition. The same is true for other terms referring to the autonomous self-modification of systems, such as learning, self-optimization and self-organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. M. Glushkov, Introduction to Cybernetics, Academic Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Maturana, “Neurophysiology of Cognition,” In: Cognition, A Multiple View, edited by P. L. Garvin, Spartan, New York, pp. 3–23, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. B. Banerji, Theory of Problem Solving, Elsevier, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Andrew, “To Model or Not to Model,” Kybernetik 3, pp. 272–275, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. R. Gaines, “System Identification, Approximation and Complexity,” International Journal of General Systems, 3, pp. 145–174, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, J. M. Dent and Sons (Everyman’s Library), London, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. S. McCulloch, “What is a Number, That a Man May Know It, and a Man, That He May Know a Number?” General Semantics Bulletin, Nos. 26 and 27, pp. 7–18, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Amarel, “On the Automatic Formation of a Computer Program Which Represents a Theory,” In: Self-Organizing Systems 1962, edited by M. C. Yovits, G. T. Jacobi and G. D. Goldstein, Spartan, Washington, pp. 107–175, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Lofgren, “Recognition of Order and Evolutionary Systems,” In: Computer and Information Sciences 2, edited by J. T. Tou, Academic Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Rothenberg, “Predicate Calculus Feature Generation,” In: Formal Aspects of Cognitive Processes, edited by T. Storer and D. Winter, Springer, Berlin, pp. 72–125, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. J. Solomonoff, “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference,” Information and Control, 7, pp. 1–22 and 224–254, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Pask, “The Logical Type of Illogical Evolution,” In: Information Processing 1962 (IFIP), North-Hoiland, Amsterdam, pp. 482–483.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. A. Arbib, “Cognition--A Cybernetics Approach,” In: Cognition, A Multiple View, edited by P. L. Garvin, Spartn, New York, pp. 331–348, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Minsky and O. G. Selfridge, “Learning in Random Nets,” In: Information Theory, edited by E. C. Cherry, Butterworth, London, pp. 335–347, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Minsky, “Steps Toward Artificial Intelligence,” In: Computers and Thought, edited by E. A. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 406–450, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. G. Selfridge, “Pandemonium: A Paradigm for Learning,” In: Mechanisation of Thought Processes, H.M.S.O. London, pp. 511–531, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Minsky and S. Papert, Perceptrons, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. M. Andrew, “Significance Feedback and Redundancy Reduction in Self-Organizing Networks,” In: Advances in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vol. 1, edited by F. Pichler and R. Trappl, Transcripta, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. M. Andrew, “Learning in Networks with Minimal Disruption,” Proceedings of Third European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vienna 1976. To be published by Hemisphere, Washington, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. B. Barlow, “Possible Principles Underlying the Transformation of Sensory Messages,” In: Sensory Communication, ed. W. A. Rosenblith, MIT Press, pp. 217–234, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. M. Uttley, “The Informon: A Network for Adaptive Pattern Recognition,” J. Theor. Biol. 27, pp. 31–67, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. D. Wall and M. D. Egger, “Formation of New Connexions in Adult Rat Brains After Partial Deafferentation,” Nature 232, pp. 542–545, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S-H. Chung, “Ineffective Nerve Terminals,” Nature 261, pp. 190–191, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrew, A.M. (1978). Succinct Representation in Neural Nets and General Systems. In: Klir, G.J. (eds) Applied General Systems Research. NATO Conference Series, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0557-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0555-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics