Skip to main content

Linkage Propositions between Fifty Principal Systems Concepts

  • Chapter
Applied General Systems Research

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((SYSC,volume 5))

Abstract

Ackoff states that “the concepts and terms commonly used to talk about systems have not themselves been organized into a system [1].” Margaret Mead can be heard meeting after meeting criticizing the field she helped popularize for not applying the “systems approach” to itself. The comparatively slow development of a paradigm in general systems theory [compare with fields described in (2) and especially (3)] is characterized by endless redefining of the same few terms followed by the rediscovery, and often rewording of the most common of these terms in each new discipline as it “popularizes” the systems level for itself. The result has been confusion in terminology, a highly fractured and “fuzzy” paradigm, and a set of introductory texts [4, 5, 6, 7] none of which can be expected to cover more than a part of the whole set of concepts available. The fragmentation of concepts between disciplines and approaches has stifled the widespread awareness of the consistent set of linkages that potentially exist among the concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. L. Ackoff, “Towards a System of Systems Concepts,” Management Science, 17, No. 11, July 1971, pp. 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. R. Platt, “Strong Inference,” Science, 146, pp. 347–353, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. M. Weinberg, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. J. Klir, An Approach to General Systems Theory, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. von Bertalanffy, General Systems Theory, George Braziller, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. W. Churchman, The Systems Approach, Delacorte Press, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. G. Miller, “Living Systems,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 48, No. 2, pp. 63–276, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. B. Wood, Communication Theory In the Cause of Man, Vol. II, No. 6-A, F. B. Wood, San Jose, California, p. 25, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. S. Iberall, Toward A General Science of Viable Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. J. Klir (ed.), Trends in General Systems Theory, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Buckley (ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine, Chicago, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Lazlo, Introduction to Systems Philosophy, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Lazlo, The Systems View of the World, Brazeller, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Earlier attempts and methodologies are partially described in the following government reports for HEW Contract No. 300–75–0224. Staff, Institute for Advanced Systems Studies, Models for Training Environmental Education Teachers Utilizing the General Systems Paradigm; (a) Revised First Interim Report, 172 pp; (b) Second Interim Report, 162 pp; (c) Preliminary Final Report, Vols. I, II, III, and Appendices.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. D. Rogers and G. Lendaris, “Systems Science Buzz Words: A Glossary,” personal communication, June 20, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Systems Seminar 230, Societal Systems and Systems Tools Handbook: A Preliminary Report, Cybernetic Systems Program, San Jose State University, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. R. Troncale, Comparative Systems Analysis, (in progress) on a PDP-10 machine language program (CCAM).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Berlinski, On Systems Analysis: An Essay Concerning the Limitations of Some Mathematical Methods in the Social, Political and Biological Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. R. Troncale and A. G. Wilson, “Process-Orientation of Natural Systems versus Goal-Orientation of Man-Made Systems.” A five-paper symposium within the Annual Meeting of S.G.S.R. held in conjunction with the AAAS, Denver, Colorado, February, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Koestler and J. R. Symthies (eds.), Beyond Reductionism, The Alpbach Symposium, Hutchinson of London, 438 pp., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. J. Kelley, “Entropy of Knowledge,” Philosophy of Science, 36, September 1977, pp. 178–196, esp. pp. 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Zwicky, Discovery, Invention, Research, Macmillan, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Zwicky, and A. G. Wilson, New Methods of Thought and Procedure, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. L. R. Troncale, “A Macro-Uncertainty Principle and the Conduct of Metasciences-like Evolution and Systems Theory,” (In preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. J. Varela, “A Calculus for Self-Reference,” International Journal of General Systems, 2, No. 1, pp. 5–24, 1975. For autopoietic extensions of the calculus and transforms between hierarchical trees and nets, see the Published Proceedings of the entire annual SGSR meeting for 1977 mentioned in Ref. 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. F. Schaffner, “Correspondence Rules,” Philosophy of Science, 36, September 1969, p. 280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Frank, Modern Science and Its Philosophy, Collier Books, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. G. Hempel, “The Theoreticians Dilemma,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by G. Feigl and G. Maxwell, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Nagel, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. F. Schaffner, “The Watson-Crick Model and Reductionism,” British Journal of Philosophical Science, 20, pp. 325–348, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. F. Schaffner, “Approaches to Reduction,” Philosophy of Science, 34, June 1967, pp. 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. R. Troncale, Natures Enduring Patterns: A Guide for Man (in progress). Also a series of 12 papers, one on each of the twelve focal systems packets and each with linkage propositions is planned for completion on sabbatical next year.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L. R. Troncale, P. Harmon, and D. Sutton, Systems Concepts Applied to the Conventional Disciplines (In progress).

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. G. Wilson, personal communication. Also discussed in [20].

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. Darden and N. Maull, “Interfield Theories,” Philosophy of Science, 44, No. 1, March 1977, pp. 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. D. Meadows, D. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth, Signet Books, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Mesarovic, and E. Pestel, Mankind at the Turning Point, Dutton Publishing Co., New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  39. H. T. Odum, and E. Odum, Energy Basis for Man and Nature, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. Emery, Systems Thinking, Penguin Books, Ltd., Harmonds-worth, Middlesex, England, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  41. E. P. Odum, “The Emergence of Ecology as a New Integrative Discipline,” Science, 195, 4284, March 1977, pp. 1289–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Troncale, L.R. (1978). Linkage Propositions between Fifty Principal Systems Concepts. In: Klir, G.J. (eds) Applied General Systems Research. NATO Conference Series, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0557-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0555-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics