Abstract
Ackoff states that “the concepts and terms commonly used to talk about systems have not themselves been organized into a system [1].” Margaret Mead can be heard meeting after meeting criticizing the field she helped popularize for not applying the “systems approach” to itself. The comparatively slow development of a paradigm in general systems theory [compare with fields described in (2) and especially (3)] is characterized by endless redefining of the same few terms followed by the rediscovery, and often rewording of the most common of these terms in each new discipline as it “popularizes” the systems level for itself. The result has been confusion in terminology, a highly fractured and “fuzzy” paradigm, and a set of introductory texts [4, 5, 6, 7] none of which can be expected to cover more than a part of the whole set of concepts available. The fragmentation of concepts between disciplines and approaches has stifled the widespread awareness of the consistent set of linkages that potentially exist among the concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. L. Ackoff, “Towards a System of Systems Concepts,” Management Science, 17, No. 11, July 1971, pp. 661–671.
T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1970.
J. R. Platt, “Strong Inference,” Science, 146, pp. 347–353, 1964.
G. M. Weinberg, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975.
G. J. Klir, An Approach to General Systems Theory, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969.
L. von Bertalanffy, General Systems Theory, George Braziller, New York, 1968.
C. W. Churchman, The Systems Approach, Delacorte Press, New York, 1968.
J. G. Miller, “Living Systems,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 48, No. 2, pp. 63–276, 1973.
F. B. Wood, Communication Theory In the Cause of Man, Vol. II, No. 6-A, F. B. Wood, San Jose, California, p. 25, 1973.
A. S. Iberall, Toward A General Science of Viable Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.
G. J. Klir (ed.), Trends in General Systems Theory, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972.
W. Buckley (ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine, Chicago, 1968.
E. Lazlo, Introduction to Systems Philosophy, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1972.
E. Lazlo, The Systems View of the World, Brazeller, New York, 1972.
Earlier attempts and methodologies are partially described in the following government reports for HEW Contract No. 300–75–0224. Staff, Institute for Advanced Systems Studies, Models for Training Environmental Education Teachers Utilizing the General Systems Paradigm; (a) Revised First Interim Report, 172 pp; (b) Second Interim Report, 162 pp; (c) Preliminary Final Report, Vols. I, II, III, and Appendices.
S. D. Rogers and G. Lendaris, “Systems Science Buzz Words: A Glossary,” personal communication, June 20, 1977.
Systems Seminar 230, Societal Systems and Systems Tools Handbook: A Preliminary Report, Cybernetic Systems Program, San Jose State University, 1975.
L. R. Troncale, Comparative Systems Analysis, (in progress) on a PDP-10 machine language program (CCAM).
D. Berlinski, On Systems Analysis: An Essay Concerning the Limitations of Some Mathematical Methods in the Social, Political and Biological Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1976.
L. R. Troncale and A. G. Wilson, “Process-Orientation of Natural Systems versus Goal-Orientation of Man-Made Systems.” A five-paper symposium within the Annual Meeting of S.G.S.R. held in conjunction with the AAAS, Denver, Colorado, February, 1977.
A. Koestler and J. R. Symthies (eds.), Beyond Reductionism, The Alpbach Symposium, Hutchinson of London, 438 pp., 1968.
H. J. Kelley, “Entropy of Knowledge,” Philosophy of Science, 36, September 1977, pp. 178–196, esp. pp. 187–189.
F. Zwicky, Discovery, Invention, Research, Macmillan, New York, 1969.
F. Zwicky, and A. G. Wilson, New Methods of Thought and Procedure, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967.
L. R. Troncale, “A Macro-Uncertainty Principle and the Conduct of Metasciences-like Evolution and Systems Theory,” (In preparation).
F. J. Varela, “A Calculus for Self-Reference,” International Journal of General Systems, 2, No. 1, pp. 5–24, 1975. For autopoietic extensions of the calculus and transforms between hierarchical trees and nets, see the Published Proceedings of the entire annual SGSR meeting for 1977 mentioned in Ref. 20.
K. F. Schaffner, “Correspondence Rules,” Philosophy of Science, 36, September 1969, p. 280.
P. Frank, Modern Science and Its Philosophy, Collier Books, New York, 1961.
C. G. Hempel, “The Theoreticians Dilemma,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by G. Feigl and G. Maxwell, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.
E. Nagel, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1961.
K. F. Schaffner, “The Watson-Crick Model and Reductionism,” British Journal of Philosophical Science, 20, pp. 325–348, 1969.
K. F. Schaffner, “Approaches to Reduction,” Philosophy of Science, 34, June 1967, pp. 137–147.
L. R. Troncale, Natures Enduring Patterns: A Guide for Man (in progress). Also a series of 12 papers, one on each of the twelve focal systems packets and each with linkage propositions is planned for completion on sabbatical next year.
L. R. Troncale, P. Harmon, and D. Sutton, Systems Concepts Applied to the Conventional Disciplines (In progress).
A. G. Wilson, personal communication. Also discussed in [20].
L. Darden and N. Maull, “Interfield Theories,” Philosophy of Science, 44, No. 1, March 1977, pp. 43–64.
D. Meadows, D. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth, Signet Books, New York, 1972.
M. Mesarovic, and E. Pestel, Mankind at the Turning Point, Dutton Publishing Co., New York, 1974.
H. T. Odum, and E. Odum, Energy Basis for Man and Nature, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.
F. Emery, Systems Thinking, Penguin Books, Ltd., Harmonds-worth, Middlesex, England, 1969.
E. P. Odum, “The Emergence of Ecology as a New Integrative Discipline,” Science, 195, 4284, March 1977, pp. 1289–1293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Troncale, L.R. (1978). Linkage Propositions between Fifty Principal Systems Concepts. In: Klir, G.J. (eds) Applied General Systems Research. NATO Conference Series, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0557-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0555-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive