Skip to main content

Some Esomathematical Uses of Category Theory

  • Chapter
Applied General Systems Research

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((SYSC,volume 5))

Abstract

Category Theory arose as a metalanguage for mathematics, and has shown great elegance and power in that role. From this position it has made and continues to make important contributions to General Systems Methodology, as witness certain papers at this Conference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Lorrain, Réseaux sociaux et classifications sociales. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Lorrain, Réseaux sociaux et classifications sociales: essai sur l’algèbre et la géometrie des structures sociales. Hermann, Paris, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Lorrain and H. C. White, “Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, pp. 49–80, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Bandler and J. H. Johnson, “On the theory of Lorrain-categories,” General Systems Depository, No. 060477, see International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, January 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Ehresmann, Categories et structures, Dunod, Paris, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Hasse and L. Michler, Theorie der Kategorien, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Bucur and A. Deleanu, Introduction to the Theory of Categories and Functors, John Wiley & Sons, London, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. C. White, An Anatomy of Kinship: Mathematical Models for Structures of Cumulated Roles, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. P. Boyd, “The algebra of group kinship,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, pp. 139–167, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. P. Boyd, J. H. Haehl and L. D. Sailer, “Kinship systems and inverse semigroups,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, pp. 37–61, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. T. Harvey and P-H. Liu, “Numerical kinship notation system: mathematical model of genealogical space,” Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 23, pp. 1–20, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P-H. Liu, “Theory of groups of permutations, matrices and kinship: a critique of mathematical approaches to prescriptive marriage systems,” Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 26, pp. 29–38, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P-H. Liu, Murngin: A Mathematical Solution, Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, 1970. (Monograph series B No. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Linzell, “The functorial reduction of social networks (a sociological commentary on Lorrain and White’s “Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks.”).” Technical Report, Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, U.K., August 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. W. Conway, W. L. Maxwell and H. L. Morgan, “On the implementation of security measures in information systems,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15, No. 4, April 1972, pp. 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. S. Graham and P. J. Denning, “Protection—principles and practice,” Proceedings of Spring Joint Computer Conference, 40, 1972, AFIPS Press, New Jersey, pp. 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. J. Popek, “Protection structures.” Computer, 7, June 1974, pp. 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Kohout and B. R. Gaines, “The logic of protection.” Proceedings of GI ’75, 5th Annual Congress of the Gesellschaft für Informatik (October 1975, Dortmund University).

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. J. Kohout and B. R. Gaines, “Protection as a general systems problem,” Int. J. General Systems, 3, pp. 3–23, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. A. Harrison and W. L. Ruzzo, “Protection in operating systems,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 19, No. 8, August 1976, pp. 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. J. Kohout, “Methodological foundations of the study of action,” Technical Report, Department of Electrical Engineering Science, University of Essex, Colchester, U.K., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. J. Klir, An Approach to General Systems Theory, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandler, W. (1978). Some Esomathematical Uses of Category Theory. In: Klir, G.J. (eds) Applied General Systems Research. NATO Conference Series, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0555-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0557-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0555-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics