Abstract
On the occasion of the 70th birthday of Edoardo Amaldi, about two years ago, I was invited to give a review talk on Neutrino Physics at the International Assembly of physicists, the major part of which was certainly not composed of neutrino physicists. Then the talk was much simpler than today, since you are all professional “neutrinists”. Notice that I have only 30 minutes at my disposition (instead of 2 hours at the Amaldi Conference). I must avoid the danger of being trivial by telling you the a,b,c of your work. A way out of this difficulty, maybe, is to give a few recollections of such developments in neutrino physics which either are curious and at the same time very important (Pauli, Fermi) or about which I happen to be well informed for various reasons. Thus my talk will be entirely subjective (at a variance with the one I gave at the Amaldi celebration) and will be mainly dedicated to the young gene ration of neutrino investigators, who are well informed about today and yesterday developments, but not so well about old ones. I shall not talk about today problems, of course, since you are all here to discuss them during almost a week. By the way, most of you are used to thinking in terms of 105 – 106 neutrino events and forgot, if you knew it, that 16 years after the Pauli neutrino hypothesis (1930) neutrinos were still considered as undetectable particles, and, as you heard today, they were first revealed in the free state only 25 years after they had been invented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pauli: letter (4 December 1930) to a meeting of physicists, among which Geiger and Meitner, taking place in Tübingen. The letter was conserved by Meitner and its content was discussed since 1930. The letter was widely published only after many years. (See, for example: Brown, Phys. Today, September, 1978).
Pauli, “Septieme Conseil de Physique Solvay 1933”, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1934).
For accurate measurements in the reaction 37A+e− →37Cl+ν (K-capture) see: Rodeback, Allen, Phys. Rev., 86: 466 (1952). A striking picture of apparent non-conservation of momentum in the beta decay of He into Li and an electron by Csikay and Szaley appeared in Proc. of the Intern. Conf., Paris, Publ. Dunad (1959).
See for reviews of the subject: Primakov and Rosen, Report on Progress in Physics, 22: 121 (1959); Fiorini, Proc. of the ν’77 Conf., Ed. Nauka, Moscow (1978). Neutrino-less double beta decay has not been observed and upper limits 10−3 − 10−4 for the lepton non-conserving relative amplitudes have been set for the double decays 48Ca→48Ti (Bardin et al.), 76Ge→76Se (Fiorini et al.), 82Se→82Kr (Cleveland et al.), 103Te→103Xe (Zdelenko et al.).
The first measurements of the 3H beta spectrum were performed by means of proportional counters in 1949: Hanna, Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev., 75: 983 (1949)
Curran et al., Phil. Mag., 40: 53 (1949). Then substantial improvements were obtained by using as a 3H source a few molecule thick layer and a magnetic spectrometer, by Bergkvist, CERN Report 69-7: 91 (1969)
Curran et al., Nucl. Phys. B39: 317 (1972). The last and best result is mνe ⩽ 35 eV (90% C. l.) (Tret’jakov et al., Proc. of the Int. Conf. on High Energy Phys., Tbilisi, Vol. II: 118 (1976)). Less accurate measurements have been performed by implanting 3H in a Si(Li) detector (Simpson, Proc. ν’79 Conf., Vol. 2: 208).
Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev., 72: 246 (1947)
Puppi, Nuovo Cimento 5: 505, 1948
Klein, Nature, 161: 897 (1948)
Lee et al., Phys. Rev., 75: 905 (1949)
Tiomno, Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys., 21: 144 (1949).
These experiments gave upper limits as bad as \( {\text{R}}\,{\text{ = }}\frac{{\mu \to e\gamma }} {{\mu \to all}}\, \leq 10\% . \) Values of R were greatly improved in a number of experiments, the bsst of which, performed with a gamma hodoscope and a magnetic spectrometer, gives a limit as good as R→2·10−10 at the 90% c. l. (Anderson, Hofstadter et al., Proc. of the Tokyo International Conference, (1978)). For other similar processes the following limits are obtained \( {{R'}}\,{\text{ = }}\frac{{\mu \to 3e}} {{\mu \to all}}\, \leq 2.10^{ - 9} \) (Korenchenko et al., Proc. of the ν’77 Conference) and \( {{R'' = }}\frac{{\mu ^{\text{ - }} + ^{32} {\text{S}} \to {\text{e}}^{\text{ - }} + ^{32} {\text{S}}}} {{\mu ^{\text{ - }} + ^{32} {\text{S}} \to \nu _\mu + \ldots }} \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{ - 10} \) (Badertscher et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39: 1383 (1977).
Wick, Wightman and Wigner, Phys. Rev. 88: 101 (1952).
Bethe, Phys. Rev. 55: 434 (1939).
Gamow and Schonberg, Phys. Rev. 59: 539 (1941).
Pontecorvo, National Res. Council Canada, Rep. PD 205 (1946)
Pontecorvo, Helv. Phys. Acta, Suppl. 3: 97 (1950).
Gamow, Phys. Rev. 70: 505 (1948).
Fowler, Appl. J. 127: 551 (1958).
Pontecorvo, JETP 36: 1615 (1959).
Markov, Proc. of Int. Conf. on High Energy Phys., Rochester p. 578 (1960).
Greisen, Proc. Int. Conf. on Instrument High Energy Phys., Interscience Publ. p. 209 (1960).
Pontecorvo and Smorodinsky, JETP 41: 239 (1961).
Zeldovich and Smorodinsky, JETP 41: 907 (1961).
Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 1: 287 (1963).
Reines et al., Proc. of the ν’72 Conf. 2: 199.
Krishnasvami et al., Proc. Roy. Soc. A323: 489 (1971); Osborne et al., Proc. of the ν’72 Conf. 2: 223
Fowler and Hoyle, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London (1965).
Colgate and White, Astrophys. J. 143: 626 (1966).
Zeldovich, Letters JETP 1: 40 (1965).
Domagatsky and Zatsepin, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Cosmic Rays 2: 1030 (1965).
Penzias and Wilson, Appl. J. 142: 419 (1965).
Dicke et al., Appl. J. 142: 414 (1965).
Zeldovich and Novikov, Lett. JETP 6: 772 (1967).
Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology, John Wiley Inc., New York (1972).
Gershtein and Zeldovich, Lett, to JETP 4: 174 (1966).
For cosmological hounds on the mass of neutral leptons see: Lee and Weinherg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39: 165 (1977)
Dolgav, Visotsky and Zeldovich, Lett. JETP 26: 200 (1977); For cosmological bounds on the number of massless neutrino see: Schvartsman, Lett. JETP 9: 315 (1969)
Steigman, Schram and Gunn, Phys. Lett. 66B: 202 (1977). See also for other limits on neutrino properties from astrophysics considerations: Bernstein, Riderman and Feinberg, Phys. Rev.,.132 1227 (1963)
Berg, Marciano and Ruderman, Phys. Rev. D17: 1395 (1978).
Pontecorvo, JETP 53: 1717 (1967); 13: 281 (1971).
Gribov and Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 28B:493 (1969).
Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 61B: 248 (1976)
Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 17: 569 (1976)
Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Comments on nuclear and particle phys. 7: 149 (1977)
Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Phys. Rep. 41: 226 (1978).
Bahcall, Proc. of the ν’72 Conference 1: 29.
Berezinsky and Zatsepin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 20: 361 (1977).
Gershtein et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 1: 106. See also Sutherland et al. Phys. Rev. D13: 2700 (1976); Pethick, Proc. of the ν’79 Conf. 1: 78 Bergen, Norway.
Chudakov et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 1: 155.
Dolgoshein et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 2: 341.
Sulak et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 2: 350.
Domogatsky et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 1: 115.
Davis et al. Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 53. The measured rate can be compared with the theoretical rate, which is about twice larger. At this time the computed expected rate is given by Bahcall in: 40 years of stellar energy, Bethe Symposium, Stony Brook, N.Y. (1979).
Lande et al. Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 887.
Zatsepin, Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 881.
See for example: Learned, Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 895.
Bethe and Peierls, Nature 133: 532 (1934).
Fermi, Nuovo Cimento 1: 11 (1934).
Reines and Cowan, Phys. Rev. 98: 492 (1953); 113: 273 (1959).
Danby et al. Proc. High Energy Conf. at CERN p. 809 (1962).
Vasilevsky et al. Phys. Lett. 1: 345 (1962).
Kobzarev and Okun, JETP 41: 1205 (1961).
Kirkwood, Hanna and Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev. 75: 982 (1949).
Davis, Phys. Rev. 97: 766 (1955).
Pontecorvo, JETP 33: 549 (1957).
Pontecorvo, JETP 37: 1751 (1959).
Nguyen Van Hieu and Pontecorvo, JETP Lett. 7: 137 (1968).
Pontecorvo and Ryndin, Proc. Kiev Int. High Energy Phys. Conf. p. 233 (1959).
Bludman, Nuovo Cimento 9: 433 (1958).
Zeldovich, JETP 36: 964 (1959)
Bouchiat and Bouchiat, Phys. Lett. 48B: 111 (1974).
Barkov and Zolotarev, Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 423.
Prescott et al. Phys. Lett. 77B: 347 (1978).
See for example: Conversi, Int. Conf. of the Europ. Phys. Soc., Geneva (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pontecorvo, B. (1982). Fifty Years of Neutrino Physics: A Few Episodes. In: Fiorini, E. (eds) Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics. Ettore Majorana International Science Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0519-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0519-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0521-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0519-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive