Skip to main content

Avian Feeding Behaviour and the Selective Advantage of Incipient Mimicry

  • Chapter
Ecological Genetics and Evolution

Abstract

Studies of mimicry have contributed significantly to our understanding of the process of natural selection and are well reviewed by Rettenmeyer (1970). The recent genetical investigation by Clarke, Sheppard & Thornton (1968) on the Malaysian butterfly Papilio memnon L. is of special importance. It confirms for a wholly separate and very different geographical area the conclusions arrived at in earlier genetic analyses of the African mimic, P. dardanus Brown, so admirably summarized by Ford (1964). These genetical studies make it clear that the evolution of mimicry results from the accumulation of numerous changes each of which increases to a small extent the resemblance of the mimic to the model. Consequently the older idea of Punnett (1915) and Goldschmidt (1945) that mimicry evolves by means of saltatory macromutations is no longer tenable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beal F.E.L. (1918) Food habits of the swallows, a family of valuable native birds. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bull 619, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower J.VZ. (1958) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies, I. The Monarch, Danaus plexippus, and Viceroy, Limenitis archippus archippus. Evolution 12, 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower L.P., Brower J.VZ. & Collins C.T. (1963) Experimental studies of mimicry. 7. Relative palatability and Müllerian mimicry among neotropical butterflies of the subfamily Heliconiinae. Zoologica 48, 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke C.A., Sheppard P.M. & Thornton I.W.B. (1968) The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 254, 37–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger R.P. (1969) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. I. Reactions of wild-caught adult blue jays to novel insects. Behaviour 35, 4–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger R.P. (1970) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am. Nat. 104, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan C.J. & Sheppard P.M. (1963) Continuous and quantal theories of sensory discrimination. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 158, 343–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan C. J. & Sheppard P.M. (1965) Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Behaviour 24, 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R. A. (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford E.B. (1964) Ecological genetics. Methuen & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R.B. (1945) Mimetic polymorphism, a controversial chapter of Darwinism. Q. Rev. Biol. 20, 147-164, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan L.P. (1900) Animal behaviour. London: Edward Arnold.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mostler G. (1935) Beobachtungen zur Frage der Wespenmimikry. Z. Morph. Öekol. Tiere 29, 381–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhlmann M. (1934) Im Modellversuch küntslich erzeugte Mimikry und ihre Bedeutung für den ‘Nachamer’. Z. Morph. Öekol Tiere 28, 259–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punnett R.C. (1915) Mimicry in butterflies. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettenmeyer C.W. (1970) Insect mimicry. A. Rev. Ent. 15, 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R.S. (1958) Behavioral evidence on the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Anim. Behav. 16, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R.S. (1960) Predator behavior and the perfection of incipient mimetic resemblances. Behaviour 15, 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard P.M. (1961) Recent genetical work on polymorphic mimetic Papilios. Symposia Royal Entomological Society 1, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe W.H. (1963) Learning and Instinct in Animals. Methuen & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windecker W. (1939) Eucheliajacobeae L. und das Schutzrachtenproblem. Z. Morph. Öekol Tiere 35, 84–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Blackwell Scientific Publications

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brower, L.P., Alcock, J., Brower, J.V.Z. (1971). Avian Feeding Behaviour and the Selective Advantage of Incipient Mimicry. In: Creed, R. (eds) Ecological Genetics and Evolution. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0432-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0432-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0434-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0432-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics