Abstract
We choose to define detritivory operationally as the relatively frequent ingestion of particulate food whose bulk generally is not composed of animal, plant or bacterial protoplasm. Our definition does not preclude the possibility that a major fraction of a detritivore’s requirements for specific nutrients may be met from bacterial, plant or animal constituents (e.g. Anderson, 1976). We consider it largely an open and exciting question whether particular detritivores or the majority of detritivores under our rather inclusive definition meet their metabolic needs by (1) digesting and assimilating non-living detritus directly, (2) employing bacteria in external “gardening” or internal “rumination” to digest detritus, (3) digesting the normal bacterial component of detritus, (4) digesting plant (e.g. benthic diatom or fragmented macroalgal) protoplasm, (5) digesting the living or recently dead faunal components of detritus, or (6) utilizing some combination of these food sources. Within this potential continuum, are there “adaptive peaks” that allow natural functional grouping of detritivores for further investigation and generalization?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, N.H., 1976, Carnivory by an aquatic detritivore, Clistoronia magnifica (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae), Ecology, 57: 1081.
Levinton, J.S. and Lopez, G.R., 1977, A model of renewable resources and limitations of deposit-feeding benthic populations, Oecologia, 31: 177.
Newell, R.C. and Field, J.G., 1983, The contribution of bacteria and detritus to carbon and nitrogen flow in a benthic community, Mar. Biol. Letters, 4: 23.
Pielou, E.C. 1981, The usefulness of ecological models: a stocktaking, Quart. Rev. Biol., 56: 17.
Seiderer, L.J., Newell, R.C. and Cook, P.A., 1982, Quantitative significance of style enzymes from two marine mussels (Choromytilus meridionalis Krauss and Perna perna Linnaeus) in relation to diet, Mar. Biol. Letters, 3:257.
Sibly, R.M., 1981, Strategies of digestion and defaecation, in: “Physiological Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach to Resource Use,” C.R. Townsend and P. Calow, eds., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Stuart, V., Field, J.G. and Newell, R.C., 1982, Evidence for the absorption of kelp detritus by the ribbed mussel, Aulacomya ater (Molina) using a new 51Cr-labelled microsphere technique, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 9: 263.
Taghon, G.L., 1981, Beyond selection: optimal ingestion rate as a function of food value, Am. Nat., 118: 202.
Taghon, G.L., Self, R.F.L. and Jumars, P.A., 1978, Predicting particle selection by deposit-feeders: a model and its implications, Limnol. Oceanogr., 23: 752.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jumars, P.A. et al. (1984). Detritivory. In: Fasham, M.J.R. (eds) Flows of Energy and Materials in Marine Ecosystems. NATO Conference Series, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0387-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0387-0_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0389-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0387-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive