Abstract
For the past several years I have been contending that the essence of the concept “organization” is to be found in the interpersonal communication networks which exist within any defined organizational boundaries (e.g. Conrath, 1973). This holds for both theory and practice. While the specifics of the contention appear to be new, the importance of communication to an organization has been argued in the literature on organizational analysis for many years (e.g. Barnard, 1938; Guetzkow, 1965; Hage, Aiken & Marrett, 1971). Furthermore, at the level of small groups interpersonal communication has been used as the basis for measures of organizational structure (e.g. Bavelas, 1950; Leavitt, 1951; Mackenzie, 1966). Unfortunately, there is little if any evidence that these measures have been applied to, or are relevant for, organizations past the size of small groups. What is lacking are measures of structure based on communication behavior that are applicable to large and complex organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnard, C.I. (1938): The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bavelas, A. (1950): “Communication Patterns in Task Oriented Groups,” Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 22, 725–730.
Burns, T. (1954): “The Directions of Activity and Communication in a Departmental Executive Group,” Human Relations, 7, 73–97.
Gönrath, DTC (1973): “Communications Environment and Its Relationship to Organizational Structure,” Management Science, 20, 586–603.
Guetzkow, H. (1965): “Communications in Organizations,” in March, J.G. (ed.). Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, 534–573.
Hage, J., Aiken, M. and Marrett, C.B. (1971): “Organization Structure and Communications,” American Sociological Review, 36, 860–871.
Leavitt, H.J (1951): “Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.
Mackenzie, K.D. (1966): “Structural Centrality in Communication Networks,” Psychometrika, 31, 17–25.
Wish, M. (1973): “Individual Differences in Perceptions of Dyadic Relations,” paper presented at the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conrath, D.W. (1978). Organizational Communication Behavior: Description and Prediction. In: Elton, M.C.J., Lucas, W.A., Conrath, D.W. (eds) Evaluating New Telecommunications Services. Nato Conference Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0175-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0175-3_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0177-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0175-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive