Use and Traffic Characteristics of Teleconferencing for Business

  • G. W. Jull
Part of the Nato Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 6)


This paper reviews results of some Canadian studies concerned with the use of teleconferencing for management and administration in business. These studies took the form of surveys to evaluate the attitudes of users of various audio and video teleconferencing systems in the federal government, the University of Quebec and Bell Canada.

It was found that the introduction and acceptance of the use of teleconferencing in various organizations has been strongly influenced by (i) the pressures imposed by decentralization or other constraints on frequent face-to-face meetings, (ii) teleconferencing being found to be satisfactory to substitute for, or complement, some face-to-face meetings, (iii) the users having favourable attitudes towards teleconferencing, and (iv) suitable technology being available.

A preliminary assessment of traffic characteristics has been made. These characteristics include bandwidth, traffic patterns, privacy, potential subscriber penetration and spatial distribution. It is concluded that more information on potential traffic characteristics of business and social service uses of teleconferencing is required. This information will be needed to define circumstances for which it would be sensible and economic to aggregate services for delivery on common facilities.


Favourable Attitude Traffic Characteristic Suitable Technology Indian Affair Shared Facility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ‘Research Report on Teleconferencing’ (Volume 1 and Volume 2), G.W. Jull, R.W. McCaughern, N.M. Mendenhall, J.R. Storey, A.W. Tassie, and A. Zalatan. CRC Report No. 1281, January 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ‘A Report on the Use of the Audio Conferencing Facility in University of Quebec’, J. Short. CSG Report P/73161/SH, (sponsored by DOC), University College, London, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ‘The University of Quebec Audio Conferencing System: An Analysis of Users Atitudes’, H.B. Thomas and E. Williams. CSG Report P/75190/TH, (sponsored by DOC), University College, London, July 1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ‘The Bell Canada Conference Television System’, E. Williams, CSG Report P/73137/WL, (sponsored by DOC), University College, London, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ‘The Evaluation of Teleconferencing: Report of a Questionnaire Study of Users’ Attitudes to the Bell Canada Conference Television System’, E. Williams and Susan Holloway, CSG Report P/74247/WL, (sponsored by DOC), University College, London,1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ‘La Telegestion a I’Universite du Quebec — bilan et perspectives’ R. Barrette, J.C. Kilfoil, C. Horin, et P. Dumas. Rapport de recherche, Vice-presidence aux Communications, Universite du Quebec, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ‘Canadian Civil Servants Perceptions of New Forms of Communications Linkages’, A.D. Cameron and J. Langlois (presentation at 18th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Montreal, June 1974).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ‘The RMT Teleconference System’, CSG Report P/72024/RD, University College, London, January 1972.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ‘Educational Telephone Network and Subsidiary Communications Authorization: Educational Media for Continuing Education in Wisconsin’, L.A. Parker, Educational Technology, February 1974.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ‘Public Service Uses of Cable Television’, M.L. Moss, (Presentation to the Second Symposium on Research Applied to National Needs, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., November 7–9, 1976).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moving from Two-Way Cable Technology to Educational Interaction W.A. Lucas. (Presentation at National Telecommunications Conference, Dallas, Texas, November 29 — December 1, 1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. W. Jull
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CommunicationsCommunications Research CentreOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations