Abstract
We pointed out in the introduction that one objective of axiomatic set theory is to avoid the classical paradoxes. One such paradox, the Russell paradox, arose from the naive acceptance of the idea that given any property there exists a set whose elements are those objects having the given property, i.e., given a wff φ (x) containing no free variables other than x, there exists a set that contains all objects for which φ (x) holds and contains no object for which φ(x) does not hold. More formally \((\exists a)(\forall x)[x \in a \leftrightarrow \varphi (x)]\).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van Heijenoort, Jean: From Frege to Gödel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1967, pp. 124–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takeuti, G., Zaring, W.M. (1971). Classes. In: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9915-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9915-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-05302-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9915-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive