Abstract
Leafing through almost any exposition of modern mathematical logic, including this book, one will note the highly technical and purely mathematical nature of most of the material. Generally speaking this may seem strange to the novice, who pictures logic as forming the foundation of mathematics and expects to find many difficult discussions concerning the philosophy of mathematics. Even more puzzling to such a person is the fact that most works on logic presuppose a substantial amount of mathematical background, in fact, usually more set theory than is required for other mathematical subjects at a comparable level. To the novice it would seem more appropriate to begin by assuming nothing more than a general cultural background. In this introduction we want to try to justify the approach used in this book and similar ones. Inevitably this will require a discussion of the philosophy of mathematics. We cannot do full justice to this topic here, and the interested reader will have to study further, for example in the references given at the end of this introduction. We should emphasize at the outset that the various possible philosophical viewpoints concerning the nature or purpose of mathematics do not effect one way or the other the correctness of mathematical reasoning (including the technical results of this book). They do effect how mathematical results are to be intuitively interpreted, and which mathematical problems are considered as more significant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bishop, E. Foundations of Constructive Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill (1967).
Cohen, P. Comments on the foundations of set theory. In: Axiomatic Set Theory. Providence: Amer. Math. Soc. (1971), 9–16.
Gödel, K. What is Cantor’s continuum problem? Amer. Math. Monthly, 54 (1947), 515–525.
Heyting, A.Intuitionism. Amsterdam: North-Holland (1966).
Hilbert, D. Die logischen Grundlagen der mathematik. Math. Ann., 88 (1923), 151–165.
Kalmar, L. Foundations of mathematics—whither now. In: Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland (1967), 187–194.
Kreisel, G. Observations on popular discussions of foundations. In: Axiomatic Set Theory. Providence: Amer. Math. Soc. (1971), 189–198.
Monk, J. D. Introduction to Set Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill (1969).
Monk, J. D. On the foundations of set theory. Amer. Math. Monthly, 77 (1970), 703–711.
Mostowski, A. Recent results in set theory. In: Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland (1967), 82–96.
Robinson, A. Formalism 64. In: Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland (1964), 228–246.
Rogers, R. Mathematical and philosophical analyses. Philos. Sci., 31 (1964), 255–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Springer-Verlag Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monk, J.D. (1976). Introduction. In: Mathematical Logic. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 37. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9452-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9452-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9454-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9452-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive