Abstract
Classical architecture included ornaments that were representations of natural forms. However, it also included ornaments whose derivation from nature was, to say the least, disputable. Furthermore, this difference did not play a significant role in the articulation of the doctrine of classical architecture, as it might if it had been taken, for example, as a criterion for a distinction between the orders. Leaving aside a few isolated examples, like Vitruvius’s mythical account of the origin of the Corinthian capital, the mimetic quality of architectural ornament was, as a rule, not discussed systematically in classical treatises.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. M. Ransdell, On the paradigm of experience appropriate for semiotic, in: this volume.
T. Llorens, Mies van der Rohe and the tradition of the picturesque, forthcoming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Llorens, T. (1982). Architecture as Representation of Nature. In: Semiotics 1980. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9137-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9137-1_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9139-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9137-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive