Abstract
Peirce uttered these words on February 10th, 1898, at Cambridge, Massachusetts, by way of introducing his lecture on “Philosophy and the Conduct of Life”.2 Over eighty-two years later, I begin my address in a tone dramatically opposed to Peirce’s. For I must reveal that I stand before you a Peircean and a feminist, searching in Peirce’s pragmatic philosophy for guidance in understanding and solving some of the many problems identified and delineated by feminist thinkers. I seek, in other words, to resurrect the Hellenic tendency spurned by Peirce, and to use Peirce’s own writing to this end. I shall look first at Peirce’s writing on practical affairs, and argue that although it throws light on certain feminist issues, it is not very helpful in terms of practical guidance. Then I shall turn to Peirce analysis of theoretical science, showing that this area of Peirce’s writing is extremely fertile in implications for feminist theory and practice.
Gentlemen, it behooves me, at the outset ... to confess to you that in this respect I stand before you an Aristotelian and a scientific man, condemning with the whole strength of conviction the Hellenic tendency to mingle philosophy and practice (1.618).1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Broverman, Inge K., Broverman, Donald M., Clarkson, Frank E., Rosenkrantz, Paul S., and Voge, Susan R., Sex-Role Stereotypes and Clinical Judgments of Mental Health, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,Vol. 34, No. 1 (1970), 1–7.
Broverman, Inge K., Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal, Journal of Social Issues, Vo. 28, No. 2 (1972), 59–78.
Fischer, L., and Cheyne, J.A., 1977, “Sex Roles: Biological and Cultural Interactions as Found in Social Science Research and Ontario Educational Media,” The Ministry of Education, Toronto.
Haack, Susan, Towards a Pragmatist Social Philosophy for Feminism, A paper presented in draft form at The University of Guelph in 1978 and (revised) at the University of Cape Town in 1979.
Maccoby, Eleanor Emmons and Jacklin, Carol Nagy, 1974, “The Psychology of Sex Differences”, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Peirce, Charles Sanders, “The Charles S. Peirce Papers;” Manuscript Collection in the Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1931–1958, “Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,” 8 volumes, Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur Burks, eds., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Pierce, Christine, 1977, Natural Law Language and Women, Sex Equality, Jane English, ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, pp. 130–142.
Popper, K.R., 1966, “The Open Society and its Enemies,” 2 vols., 5th ed. rev.; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., and Broverman, D., Sex-Role Stereotypes and Self-Concepts in College Students, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1968), 287–295.
Tavris, Carol and Offir, Carole, 1977, “The Longest War: Sex Differences in Perspective,” Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ayim, M. (1982). Theory and Practice at the Crossroads — A Peircean Perpsective on Political Signs. In: Semiotics 1980. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9137-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9137-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9139-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9137-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive