Abstract
The period 1850–1950 has given us two great investigators of reflexes, Pavlov and Sherrington. Pavlov went from the study of gastrointestinal secretions to the study of what he called higher nervous activity; Sherrington studied chiefly the spinal reflexes. Pavlov used mainly autonomic measures, while Sherrington worked with reflexes mediated through the central nervous system. Sherrington espoused a dualism, an emphasis on mind as a separate entity; Pavlov, although he was explicitly philosophically oriented, and although he admitted the importance of the subjective, asserted the necessity of objective methods in science. To Pavlov, dualism meant the confusion of subjective, individual opinions with the measurable and universal. On this basis, he considered himself a monist-materialist, without, however, subscribing to a philosophical system of materialism. Pavlov kept separate the demands of the subjective life and the laboratory, while Sherrington tried to see a unified picture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gantt, W.H. (1968). Reciprocal Relations Between Autonomic and Somatic Learning: Visceral and Motor Conditioning. In: Wortis, J. (eds) Recent Advances in Biological Psychiatry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9072-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9072-5_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9074-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9072-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive