Abstract
A memory is presumably a useful facility for the organism. As with any equipment, if we want to find how it works, it is as well to begin by asking for what it is used. The value of the memory for the organism is to increase the probability that actions taken will lead to survival. We shall expect to find the memory, then, connected on the one hand with the taking of actions and on the other with some system for assessing the results of these actions. This, which we might call a biologist’s way of looking at memory, is rather different from the more usual treatment of the memory as a record. There is indeed a sense in which the memory is a record of the past, but it is important to realize that it is probably not in any such form as a tabulated record that is consulted item by item. Von Foerster [11] has made this important point wittily by calculating the size of the record that would be needed to write out a multiplication table for 10-digit numbers (1010 x 1010). He estimates that the table would need books occupying a shelf 1015 cm long, which is 100 times the distance of the earth from the sun. However, he continues, by means of a little desk calculator with 20 wheels, he can obtain the answer to the multiplication of any two 10-digit numbers in a few seconds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Broadbent, D.F.: Perception and Communication, The Scientific Book Guild, London, 1958.
Cherkin, A.: Toward a quantitative view of the engram, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 55:88, January 1966.
Crossman, E.R.F.W.: The measurement of discriminability, Quart. J. Exptl. Psychol. 7:176, 1955.
Delgado, J.M.R.: Evolution of physical control of the brain, James Arthur Lecture, American Museum of Natural History, 1965.
Hick, W.E.: On the rate of gain of information. Quart. J. Exptl. Psychol. 4:11, 1952.
Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields and functional architecture in two non-striate visual areas (18 and 19) in the cat, J. Neurophysiol. 28:229, 1965.
Hyman, R.: Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time, J. Exptl. Psychol. 45:188, 1953.
Lenneberg, E.H.: Biological Foundations of Language, Wiley, New York and London, 1967.
Mountcastle, V.B., Poggio, G.F., and Werner, G.: The neural transformation of the sensory stimulus at the cortical input level of the somatic afferent system, in: Information Proceedings of the International Union of Physiological Sciences. XXII Int. Congr. Leiden, 1962.
Penfield, W., and Perot, P.: The brain’s record of auditory and visual experience: A final summary and discussion, Brain 86:595, 1963.
Von Foerster, H., in: Kimble, D.P. (ed.). Learning, Remembering and Forgetting, Vol. I, The Anatomy of Memory, Science and Behavior, Palo Alto, 1965.
Wiesel, T.N., and Hubel, D.H.: Single-cell responses in the striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision on one eye, J. Neurophysiol. 26:1003, 1963.
Young, J.Z.: The Memory System of the Brain, Oxford, 1966.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, J.Z. (1968). Is There an Addressed Memory in the Nervous System?. In: Wortis, J. (eds) Recent Advances in Biological Psychiatry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9072-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9072-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9074-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9072-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive