Abstract
We consider the status of the current approaches to the application of the renormalization program to the standard SU2L × U1 theory from the standpoint of the interplay of the scheme chosen for such an application and the attendant high-precision tests of the respective loop effects. We thus review the available schemes and discuss their theoretical relationships. We also show how such schemes stand in numerical relation to one another in the context of high-precision Z 0 physics, as an illustration.
Work supported in part by Department of Energy contracts DE-AC03-76SF00515 and DE-AS05-76ER03956.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See, for example, B. F. L. Ward, Acta Phys. Pol. B19:465 (1988);
R. Rankin, Proc. MkII SLC Pajaro Dunes Workshop, J. Hu, ed., SLAC, Stanford, CA (1987);
G. Altarelli, Physics at LEP, J. Ellis and R. Peccei eds., CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (1985);
G. Altarelli, Proc. HERA Experiments, Genoa, Italy (1984);
G. Altarelli, Proc. La Thuile Workshop 1987, Vol. 1, J. H. Mulvey, ed., CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (1987) and references therein.
F. A. Berends et al, Nucl. Phys. B 297:249 (1988);
M. Greco, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 11 n.5 (1988) and references therein.
See, for example, S. Jadach, preprint MPI-PAE/P Th 6/87; S. Jadach and B. F. L. Ward, Phys. Rev: D 38:2897 (1988); preprint UTHEP-88–0801;
S. Jadach and B. F. L. Ward, Phys. Lett. 220B:611 (1989); SLAC-PUB-4834, to be published in Comp. Phys. Commun. (1989).
T. W. Applequist, J. R. Primack and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 7:2998 (1973);
W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 8:3612 (1973)
(I); P. Salomonson and Y. Ueda, Phys. Rev. D 11:2606 (1975);
R. Philippe, Phys. Rev. D 26:1588 (1982);
D. A. Ross and J. C. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B 51:125 (1973);
M. Veltman, Phys. Lett 91B:95 (1980);
G. Passarono and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 160:151 (1979);
A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D22:971 (1980);
W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. ibid., D 22:2695 (1980);
W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Nucl. Phys. B 189:442 (1981)
(II); J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner, Phys. Rev. D 23:2001 (1981);
D. Yu. Bardin, P. Ch. Christova and O. M. Fedorenko, Nucl. Phys. B 175:435 (1980);
D. Yu. Bardin, P. Ch. Christova and O. M. Fedorenko, Nucl. Phys. B ibid., B 197:1 (1982); preprint PHE 88–15 and references therein;
C. H. Llewellyn-Smith and J. F. Wheater, Phys.Lett. 105B:486 (1981);
J. F. Wheater and C. H. Llewellyn-Smith, Nucl Phys. B 208:27 (1982);
S. Sakakibara, Phys. Rev. D 24:1149 (1981);
K. Aoki, Z. Hioki, R. Kawabe, M. Konuma and T. Muta, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64:707 (1980);
K. Aoki, Z. Hioki, R. Kawabe, M. Konuma and T. Muta, Prog. Theor. Phys.ibid., 65:1001 (1981);
M. Igarashi, N. Nakazawa, T. Shimada and Y. Shimizu, Nucl. Phys. B 263:347 (1986);
F. Antonelli, G. Corbo, M. Consoli and O. Pellegrino, Nucl Phys. B 183:195 (1981);
E. A. Paschos and M. Wirbel, Nucl Phys. B 194:189 (1982);
M. Consoli, S. Lo Presti and L. Maiani, Nucl Phys. B 223:474 (1983);
W. Wetzel, Nucl Phys. B 227:1 (1983);
J. P. Cole in “Trieste Workshop on Radiative Corrections in SU(2)L × U(1),” B. W. Lynn and J. F. Wheater, eds., World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore (1984); Sussex preprint (March 1983);
R. W. Brown, R. Decker and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52:1192 (1984);
W. Hollik and H.-J. Timme, Z. Phys. C 33:125 (1986);
B. W. Lynn et al, SLAC-PUB-4128 (1988);
B. W. Lynn and R. G. Stuart, Nucl Phys. B 253:216 (1985);
B. W. Lynn and D. C. Kennedy, SLAC-PUB-4039 (1986) and references therein;
M. Bohm, H. Spiesberger and W. Hollik, Fortschr. Phys. 34:687 (1986); W. F. L. Hollik, DESY preprint 88–188 and references therein.
G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, Nucl Phys. 544:189 (1972).
S. Jadach and B. F. L. Ward, to appear.
B. W. Lee and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. D 5:3121,3137,3155 (1972);
Benjamin W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Dibid., 9:933 (1974);
G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, Nucl Phys. B 50:318 (1972).
See, for example, M. Chanowitz, M. Furman and I. Hinchliffe, Nucl Phys. B 159:225 (1979).
See, for example, A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 39:3101 (1989); A. Shiekh, IC/88/346 (1988) and references therein.
See, for example, J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, “Relativistic Quantum Fields,” McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1965).
S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 8:3497 (1973);
G. ’t Hooft, Nucl Phys. B 61:455 (1973).
See, for example, W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 36:2191 (1987).
See, for example, The CERN Electro-Weak Generators Working Group Report, R. Kleiss, ed., to appear.
R. Stuart, private communications (1987, 1988);
Z. Was, presentation at this meeting (1989).
Most of this large m t difference between rows 1 and 2 is due to a difference in the degree of resummation in the two calculations (W. Hollik, private communication, 1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ward, B.F.L. (1990). Renormalization Schemes: Where do We Stand?. In: Dombey, N., Boudjema, F. (eds) Radiative Corrections. NATO ASI Series, vol 233. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9054-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9054-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9056-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9054-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive