Abstract
Lymphography is presently the most popular method for the evaluation of pelvic and paraaortic lymphatic disease and appears to be the most reliable study short of open surgical inspection and biopsy. It is well known that a negative lymphogram is not conclusive evidence of absence of disease and that a positive lymphogram is a relatively more useful entity in the diagnosis and staging of disease. We have however, as others, been experiencing an increasing number of instances in which the lymphogram was positive radiographically but open surgical lymphoadenectomy results in a histological diagnosis of reactive hyperplasia with no evidence of tumor within the excised lymph nodes. Some of these false positives are due to errors on the part of the surgeon failing to remove the radiographically positive nodes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sampson, D., Winterberger, A.R., Murphy, G.P.: The Use of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Renal Transplantation. 29: 77–86, 1972.
Winterberger, A.R., Palma, L.D., Murphy, G.P.: Ultrasonic Testing in Human Renal Allografts. 219: 475–479, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winterberger, A.R. (1977). Correlation of Lymphography Findings in the Abdomen with B-Scan Ultrasonic Laminography. In: Mayall, R.C., Witte, M.H. (eds) Progress in Lymphology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9030-5_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9030-5_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9032-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9030-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive