Skip to main content

Toward a Relativistic Theory of Statevector Reduction

  • Chapter
Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSB,volume 226))

Abstract

“For each measurement, one is required to ascribe to the ψ-function a quite sudden change… The abrupt change by measurement… is the most interesting point of the entire theory.… For this reason one can not put the ψ-function directly in place of the physical thing… because from the realism point of view observation is a natural process like any other and cannot per se bring about an interruption of the orderly flow of events.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Remarks

  1. E. Schrodinger, Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Schrodinger, Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 823 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Schrodinger, Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 844 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bohm and J. Bub, Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 453 (1966).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Pearle, Physical Review D 13, 857 (1976).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Pearle, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 48, 489 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Karolyhazy, II Nuovo Cimento 52, 390 (1966) and in this volume;

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Karolyhazy, A. Frenkel and B. Lukacz, in Physics as Natural Philosophy, edited by A. Shimony and H Feshbach (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Mass., 1982) and in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, edited by R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Penrose in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, edited by R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Diosi, Physics Letters A 120, 377 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Diosi, Physical Review A 40, 1165 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Pearle, Physical Review A 39, 2277 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Pearle and J. Soucek, Foundations of Physics Letters 2, 287 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle and A. Rimini, Trieste preprint IC/89/44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. C. Ghirardi and A. Rimini, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini and T. Weber, Physical Review D 34, 470 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini and T. Weber, Foundations of Physics 18, 1, (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. S. Bell in Schrodinger-Centenary celebration of a polymath, edited by C. W. Kilmister (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. S. Bell in The Ghost In The Atom, edited by P.C.W. Davies and J.R. Brown (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L Diosi, Journal of Physics A 21, 2885 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 52, 1657 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Pearle in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, edited by R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Pearle, Physical Review D 29, 235 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Zeilinger, R. Gaehler, C. G. Shull and W. Treimer in Symposium on Neutron Scattering, edited by J. Faber Jr. (Amer. Inst, of Phys., 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Zeilinger in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, edited by R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Pearle in New Techniques in Quantum Measurement theory, edited by D. M. Greenberger (N.Y. Acad. of Sci., N.Y., 1986). This was first brought to my attention by Y. Anaronov.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 53, 1776 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Pearle, Physical Review Letters 53, 1775 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Gisin, Helvetica Physica Acta, 62, 363 (1989).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Lindblad, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. P. Pearle, Physical Review D 33, 2240 (1986).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Pearle, Foundations of Physics 12, 249 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eq. (3.1) is a Stratonovich stochastic differential equation, which means for our purposes that the white noise and brownian motion can be manipulated as if they were ordinary functions.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eq. (3.22) is only meant to be suggestive, as B(z,t) is not an integrable function. The condition is better expressed as an inequality for the functional integral ∫RDBexp-∫dz[B(z,t)-2λtf(an-z)]2/(2λt) > ∫RDBexp-c2, where the subscript R denotes that the functional integral is restricted to a suitable range of B(z,t).

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Pearle, Journal of Statistical Physics 41, 719 (1985), and in references 23, 26, 21, and even as recentlv as reference 8. My conversion is due to discussions at Erice with Bell, Ghirardi, uisin and Shimony, which made me realize that a realist can cheerfully survive with tails in his world picture, and a recent discussion with Penrose which helped me realize that tails are not only tolerable, but they are a necessity for boost invariance.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. The nonlocal form V(a,t,v)=Σn∫ ∫dx’dxgn[φ(x),φ(x’)]Gn(x,x’,a,t,v), L(a,t,v)=Σn∫ ∫dx’dxhn[φ(x),φ(x’)]Hn(x,x’,a,t,v) is found not to satisfy the constraint (5.7c) unless Gn ana Hn are proportional to δ(x-x’), i.e. unless the form is local.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Tomonaga, Progress in Thoretical Physics 1, 27 (1946). Eq. (5.13) contains no term describing the usual interaction of the quantum field theory because it is presumed that φint(x,t) is the solution of that theory. If one wishes, the usual term can be added and φint(x,t) taken to describe the free field.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Row Peterson, Illinois, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  40. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi and P. Pearle, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  41. I would like to thank Roger Penrose for urging these considerations.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y. Aharanov and D. Albert, Physical Review D 21, 3316 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Y. Aharanov and D. Albert, Physical Review D 24, 359 (1981) emphasize this point. However, these authors considered ordinary relativistic quantum theory, with an instantaneous reduction, and concluded that the notion of a statevector itself had to be abandoned, for it is incompatible with the additional requirements of relativity and probability conservation. Because the norm of the statevector is not constrained to be 1 in the CSL theory, there is no conflict, and no need to get rid of the notion of statevector.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearle, P. (1990). Toward a Relativistic Theory of Statevector Reduction. In: Miller, A.I. (eds) Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty. NATO ASI Series, vol 226. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8771-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8771-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8773-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8771-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics