Skip to main content

The Effective Two-Nucleon Interaction from Inelastic Proton Scattering

  • Chapter
The Two-Body Force in Nuclei

Abstract

Since inelastic scattering cross-sections depend on a nuclear matrix element containing both the wave functions of the nuclear states involved and the effective interaction Veff between the projectile and the target nucleons,1 it is necessary to have an a priori value for Veff before one can use inelastic scattering as a tool for nuclear spectroscopy. An approach to determining Veff which I will explore in detail in this paper, is entirely empirical in nature. One examines transitions where the wave functions are well known and adjusts the strength of the two-body interaction to fit the observed cross-sections. If the results for a representative sample of cases are consistent one has obtained a workable interaction for spectroscopic studies.

Research supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Schaeffer, Gull Lake Symposium, September, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A95, 1(1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Wong, J. D. Anderson, J. McClure, B. Pohl, V. A. Madsen and F. Schmittroth, Phys. Rev. 160, 769(1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. J. Locard, S. M. Austin and W. Benenson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1141(1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. Austin and G. M. Crawley, Phys. Lett. 27B, 570(1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Austin, P. J. Locard, W. Benenson and G. M. Crawley, Phys. Rev. 176, 1227(1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. D. Anderson, S. D. Bloom, C. Wong, W. F. Hornyak and V. A. Madsen, Phys. Rev. 177, 1416(1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Clough, C. J. Batty, B. E. Bonner, C. Tschalsr, L. E. Williams and E. Friedman, Nucl. Phys. A137, 222(1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. Clough, C. J. Batty, B. E. Bonner and L. E. Williams, Nucl. Phys. A143, 385(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Petrovich, H. McManus, V. A. Madsen and J. Atkinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 895(1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A135, 231(1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. W. G. Love and G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A159, 1(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Moszkowski and B. L. Scott, Ann. Phys. 11, 65(1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. See for example, G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. 77, 481(1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jay Atkinson and V. A. Madsen, Phys. Rev. C1, 1377(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Petrovich, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1970 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. M. Austin, P. J. Locard, S. N. Bunker, J. M. Cameron, J. R. Richardson, J. W. Verba and W. T. H. van Oers, Phys. Rev. C3, 1514(1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Hamada and I. D. Johnston, Nucl. Phys. 34, 382(1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Bayer, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1970 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Schaeffer and J. Raynal, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Slanina and H. McManus, Nucl. Phys. A116, 271(1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. K. H. Bray, M. Jain, K. S. Jayaraman, G. Lobianco, G. A. Moss, W. T. H. van Oers, D. 0. Wells and F. Petrovich, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Kallio and K. Kolltveit, Nucl. Phys. 53, 87(1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. M. Green, quoted in A. Lande and J. P. Svenne, Phys. Lett. 25B, 91(1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. L. Whitten, A. Scott and G. R. Satchler, to be published, Nucl. Phys. A.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. W. Greenlees, G. J. Pyle and Y. C. Tang, Phys. Rev. 171, 1115(1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. W. Greenlees, W. Makofske and G. J. Pyle, Phys. Rev. C1, 1145(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. C. J. Batty, B. E. Bonner, E. Friedman, C. Tschalàr, L. E. Williams, A. S. Clough and J. B. Hunt, Nucl. Phys. A116, 643(1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. F. D. Becchetti Jr., and G. W. Greenlees, Phys. Rev. 182, 1190(1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Wong, J. D. Anderson, V. A. Madsen, F. A. Schmittroth and M. J. Stomp, Phys. Rev. C3, 1904(1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. G. M. Crawley, S. M. Austin, W. Benenson, V. A. Madsen, F. A. Schmittroth and M. J. Stomp, Phys. Lett. 32B, 92(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Schaeffer, private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  33. W. G. Love, L. J. Parish and A. Richter, Phys. Lett. 31B, 167 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. W. G. Love and L. J. Parish, Nucl. Phys. A157, 625(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. S. H. Fox, S. M. Austin and D. Larson, B.A.P.S. 16, 1163(1971).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.-L. Escudie, A. Tarrats and J. Raynal, Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1970), p. 705.

    Google Scholar 

  37. F. A. Schmittroth, Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University (1968) unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. Schaeffer and S. M. Austin, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Raynal, Trieste Lectures, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  40. W. G. Love, Phys. Lett. 35B, 371(1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. D. Gogny, P. Pires and R. deTourreil, Phys. Lett. 32B, 591(1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. H. McManus, Gull Lake Symposium, September 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  43. W. Benenson, P. J. Locard, J.-L. Escudie and J. M. Moss, B.A.P.S. 16, 509(1971).

    Google Scholar 

  44. G. R. Satchler, Phys. Lett. 35B, 279(1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. R. H. Howell and G. R. Hammerstein, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. F. Bentley, J. D. Carlson, D. A. Lind, R. B. Perkins and C.D. Zafiratos, Phys. Rev. ett. 27, 1081(1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. R. K. Jolly, T„ M. Amos, A. Galonsky and R. St. Onge, B.A.P.S. 16, 1164(1971).

    Google Scholar 

  48. C. R. Gruhn, T. Y. T. Kuo, C. J. Maggiore, H. McManus, F. Petrovich and B. M. Freedom, Preprint (MSUCL-44).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Austin, S.M. (1972). The Effective Two-Nucleon Interaction from Inelastic Proton Scattering. In: Austin, S.M., Crawley, G.M. (eds) The Two-Body Force in Nuclei. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8337-6_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8337-6_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8339-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8337-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics