Abstract
Today, co-therapy is largely used in the management of group psychotherapy. Undoubtedly, it has its advantages and disadvantages. I will deal with two of the advantages first. Number one: the interest of transference splitting onto two parental figures; number two, improved receptivity to the group through the sensibilities of two people having different backgrounds.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ancelin Schutzenberger, A., Precise de psychodrame. Editions Universities, 1966, 261 p.
Anzieu, D., et coll. Le travail psychanalytique dans les groupes Dunod, Paris, 1972, 279 p.
Basquin, M. et coll. Le psychodrame: une approche psychanalytique Dunod, Paris, 1972, 131 p.
Mc Gee, P.F., Schuman, B.N., The Nature of the Co-therapy Relationship. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1970, 20, no. 1, 25–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laxenaire, M. (1982). The Problems of Interpretation in Group Co-Psychotherapy. In: Pines, M., Rafaelsen, L. (eds) The Individual and the Group. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8154-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8154-9_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8156-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8154-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive