Biotechnological Application of Membrane Proteins Reconstituted Into Vesicular and Planar Lipid Bilayers

  • Norbert A. Dencher
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 238)


Proteins and lipids are the building blocks of biological membranes. In the past and at present, only the lipids in the form of bilayers, vesicles, and thin films found/find applications in technology. However, the membrane proteins are responsible for most of the vital processes accomplished by membranes. These proteins, which are in part or completely embedded in the lipid matrix mainly via helical amino acid regions, act as pores (channels), pumps, and transport systems for ions and nutriments. Furthermore, they are very selective receptors for hormones, neurotransmitter, drugs, medicine, and they mediate specific cell-cell recognition. Biological membranes can be regarded as the largest and most active organ in a living organism. They are the site of many vital processes for life. Photosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation, the two most important energy conversion processes in biological systems as well as sensory transduction are carried out by membranes, i.e., by the proteins residing in the membrane. Therefore, it can be expected that in the near future membrane proteins will gain great importance in biotechnology. In the following, the putative capacity of membrane proteins to serve as biosensor, biochip, and bioconverter of energy will be discussed by referring to the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin.


Lipid Vesicle Rotational Diffusion Planar Lipid Bilayer Purple Membrane Lipid Phase Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Oesterhelt and W. Stoeckenius, Functions of a new photoreceptor membrane, Proc. Nat, Acad. Sci. USA 70:2853–2857 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Dencher and M. Wilms, Flash photometric experiments on the photo-chemical cycle of bacteriorhodopsin, Biophys. Struct. Mechanism 1:259–271 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Grzesiek and N. A. Dencher, Time-course and stoichiometry of H+-release and uptake during the photochemical cycle of bacteriorhodopsin, FEBS Lett. 208:337–342 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Matsuno-Yagi and Y. Mukohata, Two possible roles of bacteriorhodop-sin; a comparative study of strains of Halobacterium halobium differing in pigmentation, Biochem. Biohys. Res. Commun. 78:237–243 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Schobert and J. K. Lanyi, Halorhodopsin is a light-driven chloride pump, J. Biol. Chem. 257:10306–10313 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Blanck and D. Oesterhelt, The halo-opsin gene. II. Sequence, primary structure of halorhodopsin and comparison with bacteriorhodopsin, EMBO J. 6: 265–273 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. A. Dencher, The five retinal-protein pigments of halobacteria: Bacteriorhodopsin, Halorhodopsin, P 565, P 370, and slow-cycling rhodopsin, Photochem. Photobiol. 38:753–767 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Briggs, Biosensors emerge from the laboratory, Nature 329:565–566 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. A. Dencher, P. A. Burghaus, and S. Grzesiek, Determination of the net proton-hydroxide ion permeability across vesicular lipid bilayers and membrane proteins by optical probes, Methods Enzymol. 127:746–760 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. T. Hong and M. Conrad, The bacteriorhodopsin as a prototype molecu-lar electronic device, in: “Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Molecular Electronic Devices”, F. L. Carter and H. Wohltjen, ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. T. Hong, The bacteriorhodopsin model membrane system as a prototype molecular computing element, BioSystems 19:223–236 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Schindler, Formation of planar bilayers from artificial or native membrane vesicles, FEBS Lett. 122:77–79 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Bamberg, N. A. Dencher, A. Fahr, and M. P. Heyn, Transmembraneous incorporation of photoelectrically active bacteriorhodopsin in planar lipid bilayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:7502–7506 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Braun, N. A. Dencher, A. Fahr, M. Lindau, and M. P. Heyn, Nonlinear voltage dependence of the light-driven proton pump current of bacteriorhodopsin, Biophys. J. 53 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.-B. Hwang and W. Stoeckenius, Purple membrane vesicles: Morphology and proton translocation, J. Membrane Biol. 33:325–350 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Racker, Reconstitution of membrane processes, Methods Enzymol. 55:699–711 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. W. M. van Dijck and K. van Dam, Bacteriorhodopsin in phospholipid vesicles, Methods Enzymol 88:17–25 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. A. Dencher, Spontaneous transmembrane insertion of membrane proteins into lipid vesicles facilitated by short-chain lecithins, Biochemistry 25:1195–1200 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Casadio and W. Stoeckenius, Effect of protein-protein interaction on light adaptation of bacteriorhodopsin, Biochemistry 19:3374–3381 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. A. Dencher and A. Wach, unpublished work.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. L. Rigaud, A. Bluzat, and S. Bushlen, Incorporation of bacteriorho-dopsin into large unilamellar liposomes by reverse phase evaporation, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 111:373–382 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Racker, B. Violand, S. O’Neal, M. Alfonzo, and J. Telford, Reconsti-tution, a way of biochemical research; some new approaches to membrane-bound enzymes, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 198:470–477 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. P. Heyn and N. A. Dencher, Reconstitution of monomeric bacteriorho-dopsin into phospholipid vesicles, Methods Enzymol. 88:31–35 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. A. Dencher and M. P. Heyn, Preparation and properties of monomeric bacteriorhodopsin, Methods Enzymol. 88:5–10 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Krupinski and G.G. Hammes, Steady-state ATP synthesis by bacterio-rhodopsin and chloroplast coupling factor co-reconstituted into asolectin vesicles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:4233–4237 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. A. Dencher, The light-energized H+-pump bacteriorhodopsin: A model system for functional transmembrane reconstitution of ion channels, receptors, and pumps, in: “Receptors and Ion Channels”, Y. A. Ovchinnikov and F. Hucho, ed., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 265–273 (1987).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. A. Dencher, Gentle and fast transmembrane reconstitution of membrane proteins, Methods Enzymol., in press (1988).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. W. Scotto and D. Zakim, Reconstitution of membrane proteins: cata-lysis by cholesterol of insertion of integral membrane proteins into preformed lipid bilayers, Biochemistry 25:1555–1561 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. P. Heyn, P.-J. Bauer, and N. A. Dencher, A natural CD label to probe the structure of the purple membrane from Halobacterium halobium by means of exciton coupling effects, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 67:897–903 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. J. Cherry, Rotational and lateral diffusion of membrane proteins, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 559:289–327 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. P. Heyn, R. J. Cherry, and N. A. Dencher, Lipid-protein interactions in bacteriorhodopsin-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles, Biochemistry 20:840–849 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    N. A. Dencher and M. P. Heyn, Bacteriorhodopsin monomers pump protons, FEBS Lett. 108:307–310 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    N. A. Dencher, K.-D. Kohl, and M. P. Heyn, Photochemical cycle and light-dark adaptation of monomeric and aggregated bacteriorhodopsin in various lipid environments, Biochemistry 22:1323–1334 (1983),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Grzesiek and N. A. Dencher, Monomeric and aggregated bacteriorhodop-sin: single-turnover transport efficiency and photochemistry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, submitted (1988).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Shinitzky and Y. Barenholz, Fluidity parameters of lipid regions determined by fluorescence polarization, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 515:367–394 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Rehorek, N. A. Dencher, and M. P. Heyn, Fluorescence energy transfer from diphenylhexatriene to bacteriorhodopsin in lipid vesicles, Biophys. J. 43:39–45 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Rehorek, N. A. Dencher, and M. P. Heyn, Long-range lipid-protein interactions. Evidence from time-resolved fluorescence depolarization and energy transfer experiments with bacteriorhodopsin-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles, Biochemistry 24:5980–5988 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert A. Dencher
    • 1
  1. 1.Biophysics Group, Department of PhysicsFreie Universität BerlinBerlin 33Germany

Personalised recommendations