Skip to main content

General Issues Regarding Psychiatric Testimony

  • Chapter
Law in the Practice of Psychiatry

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Psychiatry ((CIPS))

  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

In resolving some types of legal conflicts the court may seek information as to the mental status of one or more of the litigants. Often this information will have a critical influence on the court’s decision. The legal system uses the testimony and observations of ordinary persons in determining certain aspects of a litigant’s mental status such as his motivation. However, the presence of most forms of mental impairment is usually determined with the assistance of experts. The psychiatrist is commonly asked to evaluate litigants and testify as to their mental status. He can provide facts (such as the existence of abnormal laboratory tests) that would not otherwise be available to the court. He can also provide professional opinions as to the litigant’s emotional status. These will be respected by the court and will be given more weight than the testimony of ordinary persons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. J. Robitscher and R. Williams, “Should Psychiatrists Get Out of the Courtroom?” Psychology Today, December 1977. R. Leifer, In the Name of Mental Health ( New York: Science House, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. L. Halleck, The Politics of Therapy (New York: Science House, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. E. Dietz, “Forensic and Non-Forensic Psychiatrists: An Empirical Comparison,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 6, no. 1 (1978): 13–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. L. Usdin, “Psychiatric Participation in Court,” Psychiatric Annals 7, no. 6 (1977): 43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Kittrie, The Right to Be Different (Baltimore; Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Publishing Corporation

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halleck, S.L. (1980). General Issues Regarding Psychiatric Testimony. In: Law in the Practice of Psychiatry. Critical Issues in Psychiatry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7893-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7893-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7895-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7893-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics