Abstract
Effective diagnosis and treatment in psychiatry depend on the doctor’s ability to collect information about the patient. This information is sometimes received directly from the patient, sometimes from medical records, and sometimes from the patient’s friends or loved ones. Some of the information the doctor accumulates could be embarrassing and damaging to the patient if communicated to a third party. At the same time there are many instances in which sharing of information about the patient with others can be extremely beneficial to the patient. It is, therefore, critical that the psychiatric physician have guidelines to help him judge when he can pass on information about the patient to others. These guidelines should cover the regulation of information that is in the doctor’s own head as well as in his medical records.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
W.H.Van Hoose and J.A.Kottler,Ethical and Legal Issues in Counseling and Psychotherapy,(San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1977).
G. Annas, The Rights of Hospital Patients (New York: Avon Books, 1975), chap. 10.
R. Slovenko, Psychiatry and Law (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973), chap. 4.
C. Kennedy, “The Psychotherapists’ Privilege,” Washburn Law Journal 12, no. 3 (1973): 297–316.
Therapeutic Confidentiality, Mental Disability Law Reporter 2,no. 2–3 (1977): 339.
A. H. Bernstein, “Protecting Psychiatric Records,” Hospitals 47 (1973): 100–103.
Psychiatrist Jailed in Privilege Challenge, Psychiatric News 12,no. 16 (1977): 1.
R. Sadoff, “Pennsylvania Psychiatrist Vindicated in Refusing Judge’s Request for Records,” Legal Aspects of Medical Practice 7, no. 2 (1979): 38–39.
State Court Upholds Records’ Privilege, Psychiatric News 13, no. 12 (1978): 1.
R.Sadoff,“Informed Consent,Confidentiality and Privilege in Psychiatry:Practical Applications,”Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2,no.2(1974):1.
P. Chodoff, “Psychiatry and the Fiscal Third Party,” American Journal of Psychiatry 135, no. 10 (1978): 1141–47; American Psychiatric Association, “Confidentiality. and Third Parties: A Report of the APA Task Force on Confidentiality as It Relates to Third Parties” ( Washington, D.C.: APA, 1975 ).
See “Health Records and Confidentiality, An Annotated Bibliography with Abstracts” (Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Confidentiality of Health Records, 1977).
G. J. Annas, The Rights of Mental Patients (New York: Avon Books 1975), chap. 10.
L. Foster, “Group Psychotherapy: A Pool of Legal Witnesses,” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 25 (1975): 50.
R. Slovenko, “Group Psychotherapy: Privileged Communication and Confidentiality,” Journal of Psychiatry and Law,fall, 1977, pp. 405–67.
Ellis v. Ellis, 472 S.W.2d 741 (Tenn. Aff. 1971); but a more recent case suggests that this issue is far from settled: see “Privilege Denied in Joint Therapy,” Psychiatric News 14, no. 9 (1979): 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Plenum Publishing Corporation
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halleck, S.L. (1980). Confidentiality in Psychiatric Practice. In: Law in the Practice of Psychiatry. Critical Issues in Psychiatry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7893-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7893-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7895-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7893-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive