Electron Microscopy of SAP Following Tensile Deformation or Quenching

  • Erich Ruedl
  • Pierre Guyot


Transmission electron microscopy is used to support the mechanisms of plastic deformation for SAP-type alloys. An extruded Al-4wt % A12O3 SAP alloy, which was annealed for 2 hr at 500° C., was studied either before or after tensile deformation at various temperatures. In the extruded and annealed alloy, the grains are elongated along the direction of extrusion with a more or less homogeneous distribution of the alumina particles. The samples deformed in tensile tests at low temperatures (-196 to +20°C) reveal a high density of dislocations; the dislocations tend to arrange in cell boundaries with increasing strain. Evidence for cross-slip of dislocations is given by the direct observation of cross-slip traces in the region between the particles. For low deformations (≤ 1%) at 20°C., the dislocation density calculated from the activation volume for the dislocation intersection process (forest process) is in fair agreement with the dislocation density measured by electron microscopy. After deformation at 350°C., the dislocation density is also high, while dislocation loops can be recognized both attached to the particles and isolated. After deformation at 500° C., the dislocation density is much reduced in most of the grains, and the remaining dislocations are pinned principally by the particles. Reactions of attractive dislocations, however, can be recognized in grains where there is still a high dislocation density. A study of the same alloy after cold-rolling, annealing at 640° C., and subsequent cooling either by quenching or slow cooling leads to the conclusion that the particle-matrix interface normally is not coherent. This is supported by the fact that a full structural relationship between the larger particles and the matrix which may lead to coherency occurred only rarely and because the strain field surrounding the smaller particles is consistent with differential thermal contraction effects rather than with coherency.


Dislocation Density Strain Field Alumina Particle Dislocation Loop Tensile Deformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Guyot, P., “On the Mechanisms of Plastic Deformation of SAP-Type Alloys,” this volume, pp. 112–130.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirsch, P. B., “Conference on Relation Between Structures and Strength in Metals and Alloys,” Natl. Phys. Lab., Gt. Brit. (Teddington), 1963.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D., and H. G. F. Wilsdorf, Electron Microscopy and Strength of Crystals, Interscience (New York-London), 1963, p. 575.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilsdorf, H. G. F., and J. Schmitz, J. Appl. Phys. 33: 1750 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ham, R. K., and M. G. Wright, Phil. Mag. 10: 937 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grosskreutz, J. C., and G. G. Shaw, Phil. Mag. 10: 961 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ham, R. K., Phil. Mag. 7: 1177 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guyot, P., Ph.D. thesis, Orsay, France, 1965; see also Euratom Report 2483f (1965).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guyot, P., Acta Met. 12: 941 (1964); see also Mem. Sci. Rev. Met. LXI: 555 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keh, A. S., Direct Observation of Imperfections in Crystals, Interscience (New York-London), 1962, p. 213.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ham, R. K., Phil Mag. 6: 1183 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guyot, P., and P. Debeir, Acta Met. 14: 43 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodrich, R. S., and G. S. Ansell, Acta Met. 12: 1097 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amelinckx, S., and W. Dekeyser, Solid State Physics, Vol. 8, Academic Press (New York), 1959, p. 325.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hirsch, P. B., Aachen Colloquium, 1958.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tetelman, A. S., Acta Met. 10: 813 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson, N., Froc. Phys. Soc. (London) B66: 481 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phillips, V. A., and J. D. Livingston, Phil. Mag. 7: 969 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashby, M. F., and L. M. Brown, Phil. Mag. 8: 1083 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruedl, E, and E. Staroste, J. Nucl. Mater. 16: 103 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Newsome, J. E., H. W. Heiser, A. S. Russel, and H. C. Stumpf, “Alumina Properties,” Alcoa Res. Lab. Tech. Paper No. 10 (Pittsburgh), 1960, p. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erich Ruedl
    • 1
  • Pierre Guyot
    • 1
  1. 1.EuratomIspra, VareseItaly

Personalised recommendations