Skip to main content

Hyperchaotic Phenomena in Dynamic Decision Making

  • Chapter
Complexity, Chaos, and Biological Evolution

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSB,volume 270))

Abstract

Most research in psychology and behavioral science focuses on individual choice in static and discrete tasks. In everyday practice, however, we have to deal with much more complicated situations involving time delays, nonlinearities and interactions with other individuals. The purpose of this article is to show how the decision making behavior of real people in simulated corporate environments can lead to chaotic, hyperchaotic and higher-order hyperchaotic phenomena. Characteristic features of these complicated forms of behavior are analyzed with particular emphasis on an interesting form of intermittency in which the trajectory switches apparently at random between two different hyperchaotic solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Davis, H.L., S.J. Hoch, and E.K. Easton Ragsdale (1986): “An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Spousal Predictions,” Journal of Consumer Research 13, pp. 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.J. and R.M. Hogarth (1985): “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference,” Psychological Review 92, pp. 433–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. (1968): “Industrial Dynamics,” MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmain, W.E. (1963): “Problems in Industrial Dynamics,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, K. (1990): “Supertransients, Spatiotemporal Intermittency and Stability of Fully Developed Chaos,” Physics Letters 149, pp. 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosekilde, E. and E.R. Larsen (1988): “Deterministic Chaos in the Beer Production-Distribution System,” System Dynamics Review 4, pp. 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosekilde, E., E. Larsen, and J. Sterman (1991): “Coping with Complexity: Deterministic Chaos in Human Decisionmaking Behavior” in “Beyond Belief: Randomness, Prediction and Explanation in Science,” eds. J.L. Casti and A. Karlqvist, CRC Press, pp. 199–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. (1986): “Rational Choice in Experimental Markets,” Journal of Business 59, pp. 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.B. (1978): “Managerial Applications of System Dynamics,” MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.E. (1988): “Laboratory Experiments in Economics: A Methodological Overview,” Economic Journal 98, pp. 974–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, O.E. (1979): “An Equation for Hyperchaos,” Physics Letters 71 A, pp. 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, O.E. and J.L. Hudson (1989): “Self-Similarity in Hyperchaotic Data,” Springer Series in Brain Dynamics 2, eds. E. Basar and T.H. Bullock, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, O.E., J.L. Hudson, M. Klein, and C. Mira (1990): “Self-Similar Basin Boundary in a Continuous System,” Nonlinear Dynamics in Engineering Systems, Proc. IUTAM Symposium, Stuttgart, ed. W. Schiehlen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.L. (1982): “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science,” American Economic Review 72, pp. 923–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D. (1984): “Instructions for Running the Beer Distribution Game,” Working Paper D-3679, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D. (1985): “A Behavioral Model of the Economic Long Wave,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 6, pp. 17–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D. (1988): “Deterministic Chaos in Models of Human Behavior: Methodological Issues and Experimental Results,” System Dynamics Review 4, pp. 148–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D. (1989): “Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment,” Management Science 35, pp. 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974): “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, September 1974, pp. 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomsen, J.S., Mosekilde, E., Sterman, J.D. (1991). Hyperchaotic Phenomena in Dynamic Decision Making. In: Mosekilde, E., Mosekilde, L. (eds) Complexity, Chaos, and Biological Evolution. NATO ASI Series, vol 270. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7847-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7847-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7849-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7847-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics