Skip to main content

The Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox: might nature be more imaginative than us?

  • Chapter
  • 69 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Subnuclear Series ((SUS,volume 25))

Summary

We present arguments against the existence of the EPR state using only elementary fundamental properties of quantum mechanics. The popular arguments in favor of the EPR, such as the example given by Einstein et al, the superposition principle, and the conservation of angular momentum are discussed and found not compelling. With particular emphasis we argue that an action at a distance which would justify the EPR must be a message violating special relativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Clauser and A. Shimony, Rep. Progr. Phys. 41, 1881, 1978;

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Selleri and G. Tarozzi, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 4 (2), 1, 1981;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Pipkin, Adv. in Atomic and Molec. Phys. 14, 281, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777, 1935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cited by M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics; Wiley, N.Y., 232, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory; Prentice Hall, N.J.,614, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Ne’eman, Symp. Foundations of Modern Physics, eds. P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt; World Scientific, Singapore, 481, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1223, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Fry and R. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Bell, Physics 1, 195, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Bohm and Y. Aharanov, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070, 1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Wilson, J. Lowe and D. Butt, J. Phys. G. 2, 613, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Jammer, Symp. Foundations of Modern Physics, loc. cit., p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Rosen, Symp. Foundations of Modern Physics, loc. cit., p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Piccioni, P. Bowles, C. Enscoe, R. Garland and W. Mehlhop, Open Questions in Quantum Physics, eds. G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merve; D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Dordrecht, Holland, 103, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696, 1935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Wick, A. Wightman and E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 88, 101, 1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Furry, Phys. Rev. 49, 393, 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Wu and I. Shaknov, Phys. Rev. 77, 136, 1950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Wheeler, Ann. New York Academy of Sciences 48, 219, 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Yang, Phys. Rev 77, 242, 1950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Kasday, J. Ullman and C. Wu, Rendiconti Scuola Internazionale di Fisica. Course 49, ed. B. d’Espagnat; Academic Press, N.Y., 195, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Clauser and M. Horne, Phys. Rev. D10, 526, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Marshall, E. Santos and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. 98A, 5, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Wightman, Phys. Rev. 74, 1813, 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Clauser, Nuovo Cimento 33B, 740, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Duncan, W. Perrie, H. Beyer and H. Kleinpoppen, Second European Conference on Atomic and Molecular Phys., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985;

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Kleinpoppen, Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Foundations of QM, eds. M. Namiki et al; The Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 59, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Mehlhop and O. Piccioni, Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Foundations of QM. Tokyo, loc. cit., p. 72;

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. Piccioni and W. Mehlhop, Symp. at Joensuu. Finland, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore) 197, 1985;

    Google Scholar 

  32. O. Piccioni and W. Mehlhop, Conference on New Techniques and Ideas in Q. Measurement Theory, Ann. N.Y. Acad. of Sciences, 480, 458. 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edition; McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 63, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reference added in proofs.) A beautiful new model of EPR apparatus was built by C.O. Alley and Y. H. Shih using laser technology without atomic beams. The authors successfully demonstrated the same full EPR correlation of linear polarizations as that present in the atomic beam experiments. C.O. Alley and Y.H. Shih, Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Foundations of QM, Tokyo, loc. cit., p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piccioni, O., Mehlhop, W., Wright, B. (1990). The Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox: might nature be more imaginative than us?. In: Zichichi, A. (eds) The Superworld II. The Subnuclear Series, vol 25. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7467-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7467-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7469-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7467-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics