An Integrated Assessment Model for Public Policy Alternatives, Priorities, and Outcomes in Geothermal Environments

Abstract

During the course of a research project on geothermal development in Imperial County, California, it became apparent that a broad perspective was essential if public policy alternatives, priorities, and possible outcomes were to be systematically delineated. Among the reasons for this belief are the following:

• 1. Geothermal energy sources could become important in filling the energy needs of the nation.

• 2. Research insights are necessary if rational long-term alternative energy policies are to be developed.

• 3. Overlap and duplication of research efforts often slow development and waste funds, especially when there is lack of communication and overlapping efforts.

• 4. Optimal mechanisms are needed to determine site locations vis-à-vis economic, social, and environmental costs.

• 5. Mechanisms are needed to expedite the decision-making process to speed geothermal resource development and to aid in formulating long-range national, state, and localized geothermal energy policies.

• 6. Communities need to prepare for changes prior to development of geothermal and other energy resources.

• 7. Information which can be applied to local geothermal planning elements is necessary if local jurisdications are to have any input and control over their resource development.