Skip to main content

Understanding “Why”: Its Significance in Early Intelligence

  • Chapter
Origins of Intelligence

Abstract

The past decade of developmental research has led to a heightened respect for the intellectual functioning of the very young child. Following the direction set by Piaget many years ago, several investigators have suggested that from the earliest months the child categorizes and interprets the world that confronts him (Kagan, 1972; Eimas, in press; Haith et al., 1969). According to this view, the child develops a large repertoire of concepts that define the objects, people, places, and events with which he has contact. The processes through which the categories are defined differ according to the age of the child and the type of information involved. For example, neonates have been found to give preferential attention to moving objects and to light and dark contrasts, indicating that these perceptions may be present in the visual system at birth (Kagan, 1972). Also at a very early age infants appear to recognize and even to prefer the human face and voice over other shapes and sounds, a preference that some investigators have interpreted as suggesting that the human child has a perceptual set for attending to these human attributes (Fantz, 1961; Eimas et al., 1971). Other kinds of information processing appear to be dependent upon the child’s maturation and/or his experience with the external world. Gibson (1969) has suggested that the young child’s early attention to single features gradually gives way to perception of bundles of features, which are perceived at a later developmental stage as distinctive features that the child uses in deriving higher-level categories. It is difficult to say at what point in the child’s development his early percepts become organized as concepts. What is important to our purposes is that the child is no longer being viewed as a passive recipient of external stimulation; rather, he is seen as an active processor of information from a very early age (see Kessen, 1965). Investigators generally agree not only that the child’s early learning is extensive and complex but that it is also accomplished nonverbally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, D1973, The development of predication in child language, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A., and Baldwin, C1970, “Cognitive Content of Mother—Child Interaction,” OE Project Report, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barten, S. S., and Blank, M1972, Soviet research on speech and language: An American perspective, Early Child Development and Care, 1: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever, T1970, The cognitive basis for linguistic structures, in “Cognition and the Development of Language,” J. R. Hayes (ed.), Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, M1973, “Teaching Learning in the Preschool: A Dialogue Approach,” Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, M1974, Cognitive functions of language in the preschool years, Developmental Psychology, 10: 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, M., and Solomon, F1968, A tutorial language program to develop abstract thinking in socially disadvantaged preschool children, Child Development, 39: 379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, M., and Solomon, F1969, How shall the disadvantaged child be taught? Child Development, 40: 47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L1970, “Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars,” MIT Research Monograph No. 59, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L1973, “One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax,” Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame, M. D. S1974, Beginning grammar, Science, 184: 1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R1958, “Words and Things,” Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R1968, The development of WH questions in child speech, Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 7: 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R1973a, “A First Language: The Early Stages,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R1973b, Development of the first language in the human species, American Psychologist, 28: 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Bellugi, U1964, Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax, Harvard Educational Review, 34: 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrelashviti, N. V1972, On a critical moment in the child’s mental (speech) development, Early Child Development and Care, 1: 197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V1973, What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language, in “Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language,” T. E. Moore (ed.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V1974, Some aspects of the conceptual bases for first language acquisition, in “Language Perspectives—Acquisition, Retardation, and Intervention,” R. L. Schietelbusch and L. L. Lloyd (eds.), University Park Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R1974, Performing without competence, Journal of Child Language, 1: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimas, P. D1975, Speech perception in early infancy, in “Infant Perception,” L. B. Cohen and P. Salapatek (eds.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Juscyx, P., and Vigorito, J1971, Speech perception in infants, Science, 171: 303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S1970, Discourse agreement: How children answer questions, in “Cognition and the Development of Language,” J. R. Hayes (ed.), Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, G. L1942, The questioning activity of children, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 60: 337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, R. L1961, The origin of form perception, Scientific American, May: 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, R. L1965, Usual perception from birth as shown by pattern selectivity, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 118: 793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glsson, E. J1969, “Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development,” Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. B1973, Code switching in children’s language, in “Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language,” T. E. Moore (ed.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haith, M., Kessen, R., and Collins, D1969, Response of the human infant to level of complexity of intermittent visual movement, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7: 52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, S1930, “Intellectual Growth in Young Children with an Appendix on Children’s Why Questions by Nathan Isaacs,” Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J1972, Do infants think? Scientific American, 226: 74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessen, W1965, “The Child,” Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S., and Bellugi, U1966, Syntactic regularities in the speech of children, in “Cognition and the Development of Language,” J. Lyons and R. J. Wales (eds.), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenne, M. R1946, Experimental investigation of the relation of language to transposition behavior in young children, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36: 471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg, E1967, “The Biological Foundations of Language,” Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. M1951, “Infant Speech” ( 2nd ed. ), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. M1963, “Language, Thought and Personality in Infancy and Childhood,” Harrap, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R1961, “The Role of Speech in the Regulation of Normal and Abnormal Behavior,” Liveright, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R., and Yudovich, F1959, “Speech and the Development of Mental Processes in the Child,” Staples Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcnamara, J1972, Cognitive basis of language learning in infants, Psychological Review, 79: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcneill, D1970a, “The Acquisition of Language: The Study of Developmental Psycho-linguistics,” Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcneill, D1970b, The development of language, in “Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology,” P. H. Mussen (ed.), Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K1973a, Structure and strategy in learning to talk, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K19736, Some evidence for the cognitive primary of categorization and its functional basis, Merrill—Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 19: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K1974, Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development, Psychological Review, 81: 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J1952a, “The Language and Thought of the Child,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J1952b, “The Origins of Intelligence in Children,” International Universities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. H1973, Natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, 4: 328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, I. M1971, Production of utterances and language acquisition, in “The Ontogenesis of Grammar,” D. K. Slobin (ed.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H1971, Sensori-motor action patterns as a condition for the acquisition of syntax, in “Language Acquisition: Models and Methods,” R. Huxley and E. Ingram (eds.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I1973, Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar, in “Studies of Child Language Development,” C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (eds.), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E1972, Mothers’ speech to children learning language, Child Development, 43: 549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W1930, “Psychology of Early Childhood,” Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L1962, “Thought and Language,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wier, R1962, “Language in the Crib,” Mouton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blank, M., Allen, D.A. (1976). Understanding “Why”: Its Significance in Early Intelligence. In: Lewis, M. (eds) Origins of Intelligence. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6961-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6961-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-6963-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6961-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics