A Stochastic Theory of the Generalized Cobb-Douglas Production Function

  • John F. Muth
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 332)


Factor substitution relations and returns to scale found in empirical studies of production functions are modeled in a way that is fully integrated with technological change and process innovation. The model is based on the Pareto boundary of random n-tuples, which is a rectangular hyperbola, asymptotic to the axes, whose parameter depends on the amount of sampling (search) activity. Conversion from probability fractiles to natural units of measurement of the factors give the Cobb-Douglas factor substitution relations. The influence of inputs on outputs is somewhat different because an upper bound on output cannot be assumed.


Production Function Natural Unit Rectangular Hyperbola Contract Production Progress Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alchian, A. A. (1959), “Costs and Outputs,” M. Abramovitz et al. (Eds.), The Allocation of Economic Resources, Stanford University Press, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1962) “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” Review of Economic Studies 29, pp. 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chenery, H. B. (1949), “Engineering Production Functions,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, pp. 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb, C. W., and P. H. Douglas (1928), “A Theory of Production,” American Economic Review 18 (Supplement), pp. 139–165.Google Scholar
  5. Grossman, E. R. F. W. (1959), “A Theory of the Acquisition of Speed Skill,” Ergonomics 2, pp. 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evenson, R. E., and Y. Kislev (1975), “A Stochastic Model of Applied Research,” Journal of Political Economy 84, pp. 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferguson, A. R. (1951), “An Airline Production Function” (Abstract), Econometrica 19, pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, R. A., and L. H. C. Tippett (1928), “Limiting Forms of the Frequency Distribution of the Largest or Smallest Member of a Sample,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 24, pp. 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fréchet, M. (1927), “Sur la Loi de Probabilité de l’Écart Maximum,” Annales de la Societe Polonaise de Mathematiques 6, pp. 93–116.Google Scholar
  10. Galambos, J. (1978), The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics,Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Gnedenko, B. (1943), “Sur la Distribution Limite du Terme Maximum d’une Serie Aleatoire,” Annals of Mathematics 44, pp. 423–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gumbel, E. J. (1958), Statistics of Extremes,Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hirsch, Werner Z. (1952), “Manufacturing Progress Functions,” Review of Economics and Statistics 34, pp. 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamien, Morton I., and Nancy L. Schwartz (1982), Market Structure and Innovation,Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kurz, M., and A. S. Manne (1963), “Engineering Estimates of Capital-Labor Substitution in Metal Machinery,” American Economic Review 53, pp. 662–681.Google Scholar
  16. Lele, P. T., and J. W. O’Leary (1972), “Applications of Production Functions in Management Decisions,” American Institute of Industrial Engineers Transactions 4, pp. 36–42.Google Scholar
  17. Levy, F. K. (1965), “Adaptation in the Production Process,” Management Science 11(B), pp. 136–154.Google Scholar
  18. Mansfield, Edwin (1965), “Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development,” American Economic Review 55 (Supplement), pp. 310–322.Google Scholar
  19. Misès, R. de (1936), “La Distribution de la Plus Grande de n Valeurs,” Revue Mathematíque de l’Union Interbalkanique 1, pp. 141–160.Google Scholar
  20. Muth, John F. (1982), “Process Life Cycles and ExperienceCurves,” ORSA/TIMS National Meeting, San Diego, October 25–27. (Indiana University, School of Business, Discussion Paper #199, October 25, 1982.)Google Scholar
  21. Muth, John F. (1986a), “Search Strategies for Invention and Productivity Improvement,” ORSA/TIMS National Meeting, Atlanta, November 4–6Google Scholar
  22. Muth, John F. 1985.. (Indiana University, School of Business, Discussion Paper #306, April 8, 1986.)Google Scholar
  23. Muth, John F. (1986b), “Search Theory and the Manufacturing Progress Function,” Management Science 32, pp. 948–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muth, John F. (1988), “A Model of Learning Curves with Restricted Random Sampling.” (Indiana University, School of Business, Discussion Paper #391, July 5, 1988.)Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, Peter C. (1983), “A Theory of the Learning Process,” Journal of the Operational Research Society 34, pp. 71–79.Google Scholar
  26. Rosen, Sherwin (1972): “Learning by Experience as Joint Production,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 86, pp. 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sahal, D. (1979), “A Theory of Progress Functions,” American Institute of Industrial Engineers Transactions 11, pp. 23–29.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, V. L. (1957), “Engineering Data and Statistical Techniques in Analysis of Production and Technological Change: Fuel Requirements in the Trucking Industry,” Econometrica 25, pp. 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Telser, Lester G. (1982), “A Theory of Innovation and Its Effects,” Bell Journal of Economics 13, pp. 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tippett, L. H. C. (1925), “On the Extreme Individuals and the Range of Samples Taken from a Normal Population,” Biometrica 17, pp. 364–387.Google Scholar
  31. Venezia, Itzhak (1985), “On the Statistical Origins of the Learning Curve,” European Journal of Operational Research 19, pp. 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weibull, E. H. Waloddi (1939), “A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Materials,” Ingeniors Vetenskaps Akademiens Nandlíngar Nr. 151.Google Scholar
  33. Womer, N. Keith (1979), “Learning Curves, Production Rate, and Program Costs,” Management Science 25, pp. 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Womer, N. Keith (1984), “Estimating Learning Curves from Aggregate Monthly Data,” Management Science 30, pp. 982–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Womer, N. Keith (1984), & Katsuaki Terasawa (forthcoming), “The Effect of Defense Program Uncertainty on Cost, Schedule, and Capital Investment,” Journal of Productivity Analysis. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Muth
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations