Advertisement

Process Control with Lot Sizing

  • Michael H. Peters
Conference paper
  • 92 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 332)

Abstract

One of the widely used statistical approaches to maintaining control of a process is the control chart. To use this tool, the designer must determine three parameters: the sample size to be taken from the output of the process, the control limits on the chart, and the number of units to be produced between samplings (the intersample interval). The general procedure is administered as follows: near the end of the intersample interval a number of units are taken from the output of the process; the sampled units are inspected; if the resulting information does not fit within the prescribed control limits, the process is stopped and investigated for the presence of an assignable source that may be altering the output of the process.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, R.C., “The Marriage of Zero Inventories and Conditional Sampling Procedures, ”Production and Inventory Management, 28, 1 (1987), 27–30.Google Scholar
  2. Chung, C., “Quality Control Sampling Plans under Zero Inventories: An Alternative Method,” Production and Inventory Management, 28, 2 (1987), 37–42.Google Scholar
  3. Duncan, A.J., “The Economic Design of x-Charts Used to Maintain Current Control of a Process,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 51, 274 (1956) 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hald, A., “The Compound Hypergeometric Distribution and a System of Single Sampling Inspection Plans Based on Prior Distributions and Costs,” Technometrics, 2, 3 (1960), 275–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Knappenberger, H. and A.H.E. Grandage, “Minimum Cost Quality Control Tests,” AIIE Transactions, 1, 1 (1969) 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Krupp, J.A.G., “Reconciling Quality Control Sampling Plans and Zero Inventories,” Production and Inventory Management, 26, 3 (1985) 143–148.Google Scholar
  7. Lee, H.L. and M.J. Rosenblatt, “Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System,” Management Science, 33, 9 (1987), 1125–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Montgomery, D.C., R.G. Heikes and J.F. Mance, “Economic Design of Fraction Defective Control Charts,” Management Science, 21, 11 (1975), 1272–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Montgomery, D.C., “The Economic Design of Control Charts: A Review and Literature Review,” Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 2 (1980), 75–87.Google Scholar
  10. Porteus, E.L., “Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction,” Operations Research, 34, 1 (1986), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosenblatt, M.J. and H.L. Lee, “Economic Production Cycles with Imperfect Production Processes,” IIE Transactions, 18, 3 (1986), 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael H. Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Quantitative Business Analysis DepartmentLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations