Abstract
Moderator (Oscar Sudilovsky): After such interesting presentations I think it is time to concentrate on the mechanistic similarities between tumor promotion and progression. Dr. Pitot, if I interpret him correctly, said that the effect of promoting agents can extend to cells in the stage of progression, while Dr. Slaga expressed the opinion that both processes exist as a continuum. So I would like to start the discussion by asking Dr. Pitot how he would contrast his belief with those of Dr. Slaga.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
O. Sudilovsky and T. K. Hei: Aneuploid nuclear DNA content in some enzyme-cultured rat liver foci during tumor promotion. Fed. Proc. 42:7 (1983).
J. H. Wang, L. Hinrichsen, C. Mansilla and O. Sudilovsky: Hepatocarcinogenesis: Aneuploid nuclear DNA content in enzyme-altered foci (EAF) in rats. Lab. Invest. 58:100A (1988).
S. L. Robbins and R. S. Cotran, “The Pathologic Basis of Disease”, 2nd Edition, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1979, p. 182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sudilovsky, O., Pitot, H.C., Liotta, L.A. (1991). Discussion of Session. In: Sudilovsky, O., Pitot, H.C., Liotta, L.A. (eds) Boundaries between Promotion and Progression during Carcinogenesis. Basic Life Sciences, vol 57. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5994-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5994-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5996-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5994-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive