Abstract
As one in the bioremediation industry, I’d answer the title’s rhetorical question with the word “both.” Bioremediation, if we disregard inflated claims, is good science. And lately it has been receiving a good press, which hasn’t hurt our cause either. Neither the scientific community nor the press, however, has been the primary influence on demand for bioremediation. That role has been and continues to be played by the regulator. Our business is regulation driven; it is only to the extent that public or scientific opinion influences regulations that it can be said to have a major effect. When the EPA’s William Reilly touts the potential of bioremediation, and it is widely reported in the press, then we have scored a major point.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zitrides, T.G. (1991). An Historical Perspective: Does Good Science or Good Press Generate Demand?. In: Sayler, G.S., Fox, R., Blackburn, J.W. (eds) Environmental Biotechnology for Waste Treatment. Environmental Science Research, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5955-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5955-5_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5957-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5955-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive