Skip to main content

A Speech Act Based Model for Analyzing Cooperative Work in Office Information Systems

  • Chapter
Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science V

Abstract

In this paper we present the SAMPO-approach for modelling and analyzing office information systems. We emphasize the collective features of office work and the role of communications in coordinating the collective efforts. The approach is based on the language action view where language is seen as a means of doing things. The approach also accepts the fact that collective work includes both harmony and conflict and tries to capture both of these features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auramäki, E., Lehtinen, El, and Lyytinen, K., 1988, A Speech Act Based Office Modelling Approach, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., 1962, How to do Things with Words, Claredon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, J., 1980, Conflict Management in the Systems Environment, Journal of Systems Management, February 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, J., Chou, H-T, Garza, J., Kim, W., Woelk, D., Ballou, N., and Kim, H-J, 1987, Data Model Issues for Object-Oriented Applications, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgida, A., 1985, Language Features for flexible Handling of Exceptions in Information Systems, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 10, No. 4, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briefs, U., Ciborra, C., and Schneider, L., eds, 1983, Systems Design For, With, and By the Users, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning McNurlin, B., ed., 1986, Spotlight on Group Services, EDP Analyzer, Vol. 24, No. 11, November 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., 1984, Management Information Systems: A Contractual View, Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness, Bemelmans, Th. M. A., ed., Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P., and Levesque, H., 1987, Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication, November 24, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSCW86, 1986, Materials of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,Austin, Texas. Dimino, S., 1983, Corporate Politics and the System’s Process, Journal of Systems Management,September 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, F., and Ludlow, J., 1980, Doing and Speaking in the Office, Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, Fick, G., and Sprague, R., eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., 1985, Office Automation, A Social and Organizational Perspective, John Wiley and Sons. Howard, R., 1987, Design and Social Responsibility: The Political Implications of ‘Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Office: Technology and People, 3, pp. 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke, M., Jelassi, M., and Shakun, M., 1987, MEDIATOR: Towards a Negotiation Support System, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 31, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrough, S., 1988, “On Representation Schemes for Electronic Promising”, a paper presented at the 21st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, C., 1988, A Commitment-Based Communication Model for Distributed Office Environments, Proc. of Conf. on Office Information Systems, SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 2 and 3, April and July 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., 1988, A Logic Model for Electronic Contracting, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, March 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, E., and Lyytinen, K., 1986, Action Based Model of Information Systems, Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K., and Lehtinen, K., 1984, On Information Modelling Through Illocutionary Logic, Third Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information Modelling and Data Base Management, Kangassalo, H., ed., Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Ser. B 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K., and Lehtinen, K., 1985, Discourse Analysis as an Information System Specification Method, Proceedings of the 7th Scandinavian Seminar on Systemeering, Sääksjärvi, M., ed., Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T., Grant, K., Lai, K-Y, Rao, R., and Rosenblitt, D., 1987(a), Semistructured Messages are Surprisingly Useful for Computer Supported Coordination, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 5, No. 2, April 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T., Grant, K., Turbak, F., Brobst, S., and Cohen, M., 1987(b), Intelligent Information-Sharing Systems, CACM, Vol. 30, No. 5, May 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T., Yates J., and Benjamin, R., 1987(c), Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies, CACM, Vol. 30, No. 6, June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., 1986, Images of Organization, SAGE Publications Inc., Beverly Hills, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. R., Conway, L., and Atkins, D., 1987, The EXPRESS Project: Research Issues in Building and Implementing a Platform for Collaborative Technologu, Proc. of the 8th ICIS Conference, DeGross, J., and Kriebel, C., eds., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., 1969, Speech Acts - An Essay in the Philosophy of Language,Cambridge University Press. Searle, J., and Vanderveken, D., 1985, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic,Cambridge University Press. Srikanth, R., and Jarke, M., 1986, Individual Negotiation Support in Group Decision Support Systems, Proc. of IFIP WG 8.4 Working Conf. Office Systems: Methods and Tools,North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsichritzis, D., Fiume, E., Gibbs, S., and Nierstrasz, 0., 1987, Knowledge Acquisition, Dissemination, and Manipulation Objects, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., and Flores, F., 1986, Understanding Computers and Cognition, A New Foundation for Design, Ablex Publishing Company, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., 1987, A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work, Report No. STANCS-87–1158, Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, May 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Auramäki, E. (1990). A Speech Act Based Model for Analyzing Cooperative Work in Office Information Systems. In: Zunde, P., Hocking, D. (eds) Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science V. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5862-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5862-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5864-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5862-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics