Abstract
Finite element (FE) studies of energy/material interactions associated with the nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of materials have not only yielded useful information concerning the physics of new NDE phenomena [1] but also provided “test-beds” for the simulation of NDE situations too difficult to replicate in a laboratory environment [2]. FE code has been developed for the analysis of those NDE processes governed by elliptic [3], parabolic [4] and hyperbolic [5] partial differential equation (PDE) types taking advantage of axisymmetry wherever possible in order to conserve computer capacity. In those situations requiring fine spatial and/or temporal discretization, it has been found that the FE code makes excessive demands on even the best computer resources. Examples of this situation include the finite element modeling of the remote field effect in large diameter pipelines [6] and the simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation through large structures [7].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W. Lord, Y. S. Sun, S. S. Udpa and S. Nath, “A Finite Element Study of the Remote Field Eddy Current Phenomenon,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 435–438, Jan., 1988.
N. Ida, H. Hoshikawa and W. Lord. “Finite Element Prediction of Differential EC Probe Signals from Fe30, Deposits in P,R Steam Generators,” NDT International, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 331–338, Dec., 1985.
W. Lord and J. H. Hwang, “Defect Characterization from Magnetic Leakage Fields,” British Journal of Nondestructive Testing, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 14–18, Jan., 1977.
B. Allen, N. Ida and W. Lord, “Finite Element Modeling of Pulsed Eddy Current NDT Phenomena,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 2165–2168, Nov., 1985.
R. Ludwig and W. Lord, “A Finite Element Study of Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in an Aluminum Block.” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 46, pp. 108–1 13, Jan., 1988.
S. Nath, M. S. thesis, Colorado State University, 1988.
R. Ludwig and W. Lord, “A Finite Element Formulation for the Study of Ultrasonic NDT Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics. Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 809–820, Nov., 1988.
F. J. Rizzo, “The Finite and Boundary Element Methods: One Review of Their Foundations,” Advanced Boundary Element Methods, IUTAM Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 1987.
O. C. Zienkiewicz et al, “The Coupling of the Finite Element Method and the Boundary Solution Procedure,” International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 11, pp. 357–375. 1976.
H. B. Li et al, “A New Method for the Coupling of Finite Elements and Boundary Element Discretized Subdomains of Elastic Bodies,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 54, pp. 161–185, 1986.
C. A. Brebbia and P. Georgiou, “Combination of Boundary and Finite Elements in Electrostatics,” Applied Math Modelling, Vol. 3, pp. 212–220, June, 1979.
R. O. Ritchie and K. J. Bathe, “On the Calibration of the Electrical Potential Technique for Monitoring Crack Growth Using Finite Element Methods,” International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 45–55, Feb., 1979.
G. H. Aronson and R. O. Ritchie, “Optimization of the Electrical Potential Technique for Crack Growth Monitoring in Compact Test Pieces Using Finite Element Analysis,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 208–215, July, 1979.
H. H. Johnson, “Calibrating the Electric Potential Method for Studying Slow Crack Growth,” Material Research and Standards, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 442–445, Sept., 1965.
Che-Yu Li and R. P. Wei, “Calibrating the Electrical Potential Method for Studying Slow Crack Growth,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation. Vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 392–394, Aug., 1966.
K. H. Schwalbe and D. Hellman, “Application of the Electrical Potential Method to Crack Length Measurements Using Johnson’s Formula,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 218–221, May, 1981.
G. Clark and J. F. Knott, “Measurement of Fracture Cracks in Notched Specimens by Means of Theoretical Electrical Potential Calibrations,” Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 23, No. 4 /5, pp. 265–276, Aug./Oct., 1975.
R. O. Ritchie et al, “Crack Growth Monitoring: Optimization of the Electrical Potential Method Using an Analog Method,” International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 462–467, Dec., 1971.
M. E. Orazem and W. Ruch,“An Improved Analysis of the Potential Drop Method for Measuring Crack Lengths in Compact Tension Specimens,” International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 31, pp. 245–252, 1986.
K. J. Bathe and E. L. Wilson, Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood, New Jersey, 1976.
T. Rudolphi and V. Peterson, “A Modular Program for Poisson’s Equation with Linear Boundary and Domain Elements,” Advanced Engineering Software. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7–15, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nath, S., Shin, Y.K., Lord, W., Rudolphi, T.J. (1990). Boundary Integral and Finite Element Simulation of Electromagnetic NDE Phenomena. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5774-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5772-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive