Skip to main content

The Approach to Risk Analysis in Three Industries: Nuclear Power, Space Systems, and Chemical Process

  • Chapter
Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 7))

  • 289 Accesses

Abstract

The aerospace, nuclear power, and chemical processing industries are providing much of the incentive for the development and application of advanced risk analysis techniques to engineered systems. Risk analysis must answer three basic questions: (1) What can go wrong? (2) How likely is it? and (3) What are the consequences? The result of such analyses is not only a quantitative answer to the question “What is the risk?” but, more importantly, a framework for intelligent and visible risk management. Because of the societal importance of the subject industries and the amount of risk analysis activity involved in each, it is interesting to look for commonalities, differences, and, hopefully, a basis for some standardization. Each industry has its strengths: the solid experience base of the chemical industry, the extensive qualification and testing procedures of the space industry, and the integrative and quantitative risk and reliability methodologies developed for the nuclear power industry. In particular, most advances in data handling, systems interaction modeling, and uncertainty analysis have come from the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) work in the nuclear safety field. In the final analysis, all three industries would greatly benefit from a more deliberate technology exchange program in the rapidly evolving discipline of quantitative risk analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Garrick, B. J., “Lessons Learned from 21 Nuclear Plant PRAs,” International Topical Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management, Zurich, Switzerland, August 30-September 4, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volumes 1 and 2, Butterworth Co., Ltd., London, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Inc., and McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company, “Engineering Services, Numerical Risk Assessment of the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) for the United States Space Shuttle,” prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, December 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Battelle Columbus Division, “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures,” prepared for The Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Inc., “Methodology for Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants,” PLG-0209, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, “Instructions for Preparation of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL),” NSTS 22206, October 10, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, “Instructions for Preparation of Hazard Analysis for the Space Transportation System,” Preliminary, JSC 22254, November 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Department of Defense, “Military Standard System Safety Program Requirements,” MIL-STD-882B, March 30, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, III (SARA III),” 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, “Investigation of the Challenger Accident,” Ninety-Ninth Congress, October 29, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrick, B.J. (1989). The Approach to Risk Analysis in Three Industries: Nuclear Power, Space Systems, and Chemical Process. In: Bonin, J.J., Stevenson, D.E. (eds) Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5684-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5682-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics